|
Bibliography >>
2008 ACS Article Abstracts
(2008). "[Abdominal
compartment syndrome in urgent surgery]." Khirurgiia (Mosk)(7):
33-5.
Results of measurement and monitoring of intraabdominal pressure
at 288 patients treated for different abdominal diseases and trauma were
analyzed. In early postoperative period the increase intraabdominal
pressure to 10-15 mm Hg (I degree) was revealed at 161 (56.0%) patients,
from 16 to 25 mm Hg (II degree)--at 95 (33.0%), from 25 to 35 mm Hg (III
degree)--at 23 (8.0%), more 35 mm Hg (IV degree)--at 8 (2.7%) patients.
When intraabdominal pressure decreased on 4-5 mm per day the prognosis
was positive at 257 (89.2%) operated patients. Critical type regarded as
compartment syndrome (III-IV degree) was diagnosed at 31 (10.8%)
patients. Relaparotomy was performed at 23 (8.0%) patients with III
degree hypertension, the lethal outcome was at 6 (26.1%) cases.
Relaparotomy at 8 (2.7%) patients with IV degree hypertension was late,
and all the outcomes at these patients were lethal. General lethality at
compartment syndrome was 45.2%. It is concluded that monitoring of
intraabdominal hypertension should be mandatory diagnostic method, and
critical parameters of abdominal hypertension--absolute indication to
repeated laparotomy and decompression of abdominal cavity.
(2008). "[Impact of
hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the clinical course of acute pancreatitis
and systemic inflammation response syndrome]." Anesteziol Reanimatol(4):
34-8.
Feasibility of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) as an efficient
and safe adjunct to the standardized treatment protocol and its possible
immunomodulatory impact were assessed in the prospective and controlled
study of 44 patients with diagnosed acute pancreatitis (AP). The course
of the disease was accompanied by systemic inflammatory response
syndrome (AIRS) in all the patients on admission. The impact of AP and
HBO on homeostasis, the number of performed operations, mortality rates,
the levels of two cytokines, intraabdominal pressure, and side effects
caused by HBO were evaluated. A treatment group consisted of 22 patients
receiving HBO therapy for 3 days (twice a day) using a monoplace chamber
under pressures of 1.7-1.9 ATA. Patients (n = 22) in the control group
were managed in accordance with the standardized treatment protocol. The
authors found more stable homeostasis, decreased mortality rate, and the
number of operations in the HBO group. This type of additional therapy,
possibly contributed to the decrease of intraabdominal pressure within
the first six days after admission. The findings suggest HBO can affect
an inflammatory response, by decreasing the levels pro-inflammatory
cytokines and increasing those of anti-inflammatory ones.
Al-Bahrani, A. Z., G. H. Abid, et al. (2008). "Clinical
relevance of intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with severe acute
pancreatitis." Pancreas 36(1):
39-43.
OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) contributes to
organ failure in patients with abdominal trauma and sepsis and leads to
the development of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). This study aims
to investigate the clinical significance of IAH in patients with severe
acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: Patients admitted to intensive care
with SAP underwent daily measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP),
recording of the clinical data, and calculation of 4 organ dysfunction
scores. RESULTS: Among 18 patients with SAP, 11 (61%) developed IAH
(median, 20 mm Hg), whereas 10 (56%) developed ACS. The IAP correlated
significantly with the 4 organ dysfunction scores; the scores were
significantly higher when IAH existed than when it did not. The
admission IAP correlated significantly with the duration of intensive
care stay. Patients who developed IAH/ACS had significantly higher organ
failure score and greater mortality compared with those who did not.
Laparotomy and drainage reduced the IAP by a median of -11 mm Hg and
relieved the IAH/ACS in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal
hypertension and ACS are frequent findings in patients with SAP and are
associated with deterioration in organ function. Intra-abdominal
pressure correlates with the severity of organ failure, and a high
admission IAP is associated with prolonged intensive care stay.
Alder, A. C., J. L. Hunt, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
compartment syndrome associated with tension pneumoperitoneum in an
elderly trauma patient." J Trauma
64(1): 211-2.
An, G. and M. A. West (2008). "Abdominal compartment
syndrome: a concise clinical review." Crit Care Med
36(4): 1304-10.
OBJECTIVE: There has been an increased awareness of the presence
and clinical importance of abdominal compartment syndrome. It is now
appreciated that elevations of abdominal pressure occur in a wide
variety of critically ill patients. Full-blown abdominal compartment
syndrome is a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive
intra-abdominal organ dysfunction resulting from elevated
intra-abdominal pressure. This review provides a current, clinically
focused approach to the diagnosis and management of abdominal
compartment syndrome, with a particular emphasis on intensive care.
METHODS: Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical
literature, with an emphasis on the time period after 2000. PubMed
"related articles" search strategies were likewise employed frequently.
Additional information was derived from the Web site of the World
Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (http://www.wsacs.org).
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The detrimental impact of elevated
intra-abdominal pressure, progressing to abdominal compartment syndrome,
is recognized in both surgical and medical intensive care units. The
recent international abdominal compartment syndrome consensus conference
has helped to define, characterize, and raise awareness of abdominal
compartment syndrome. Because of the frequency of this condition,
routine measurement of intra-abdominal pressure should be performed in
high-risk patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence-based
interventions can be used to minimize the risk of developing elevated
intra-abdominal pressure and to aggressively treat intra-abdominal
hypertension when identified. Surgical decompression remains the gold
standard for rapid, definitive treatment of fully developed abdominal
compartment syndrome, but nonsurgical measures can often effectively
affect lesser degrees of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal
compartment syndrome.
Arigon, J. P., O. Chapuis, et al. (2008). "[Managing the open
abdomen with vacuum-assisted closure therapy: retrospective evaluation
of 22 patients]." J Chir (Paris)
145(3): 252-61.
BACKGROUND: The authors reviewed their experience in the
management of "open abdomen" using the vacuum-assisted closure device
(VAC), in order to assess its morbidity particularly in terms of
fistula, and the outcome of abdominal wall integrity. METHODS: Between
January 2003 and October 2006, 22 patients required management with an
"open abdomen" technique (18 patients were managed with the VAC
abdominal dressing device with application of a specific sheet and 4
other patients simply required a dressing with the polyurethane sponge).
The mean age was 55 years, and M/F sex ratio was 2.67. Indications were
abdominal compartment syndrome in 7 patients, initial "abdominal
closure" after trauma in one patient, severe abdominal sepsis in 7
patients, and abdominal wound dehiscence where closure was impossible in
7 patients. RESULTS: There were no enteric fistulae. Two infections were
seen--a chronic suppuration which resolved with antibiotic therapy and a
deep abscess which was drained with radiologic guidance. Of the 18 cases
of "open abdomen" managed with the VAC, 15 were alive. Six (40%)
underwent a delayed primary closure at a mean interval of 9 days; the
others underwent secondary healing by granulation, and 10 eventually
underwent split thickness skin grafting at a mean interval of 50 days.
With VAC closure of the "open abdomen", the development of ventral
hernia is an anticipated outcome; in four cases, patients underwent
abdominal wall reconstruction at an interval of one year. CONCLUSION:
Laparostomy or "open abdomen" using the VAC dressing system should be
considered an established and well-defined technique which provides
temporary abdominal coverage with limited morbidity.
Ball, C. G., A. W. Kirkpatrick, et al. (2008). "The secondary
abdominal compartment syndrome: not just another post-traumatic
complication." Can J Surg
51(5): 399-405.
The secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as
the presence of organ dysfunction with concurrent intra-abdominal
hypertension (IAH) in a scenario lacking primary intraperitoneal injury
or intervention. This state appears to be related to visceral, abdominal
wall and retroperitoneal edema and ascites induced by resuscitation.
Despite a diverse range of associated causes such as pancreatitis,
intra-abdominal sepsis, cardiac arrest, thermal injury and
extraperitoneal trauma, this class of ACS is characterized by the
presence of shock requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation. Secondary
ACS is an extreme condition along a continuum of raised intra-abdominal
pressure (IAP) that is pathoneumonic when associated with new overt
organ failure. When IAP is above normal but is not associated with organ
failure, IAH is diagnosed. Because these conditions are common among
critically ill patients, the measurement of IAP is crucial. It is
unclear whether preventing IAH reduces progression to ACS or influences
outcomes. When overt ACS is confirmed, immediate surgical decompression
of the patient's abdomen via a standard laparotomy is usually required.
Because many disease processes resulting in critical illness require
aggressive fluid resuscitation as a primary therapy, it is likely that
secondary ACS is much more common than previously believed. Further
study is needed.
Basterra Longas, A., S. Arizcun Gonzalez, et al. (2008).
"[Abviser Kit intra-abdominal pressure monitoring]." Rev Enferm
31(10): 43-4.
The authors explain what an Abviser Kit consists of as an
appropriate technique to measure intra-abdominal pressure, especially
for patients in critical condition who have a depressed immune system
since this deals with a closed system which prevents the movements a
bladder catheter causes. This method minimizes the risk of infection,
shortening hospital stays.
Basu, A. and D. R. Pai (2008). "Early elevation of
intra-abdominal pressure after laparotomy for secondary peritonitis: a
predictor of relaparotomy?" World J Surg
32(8): 1851-6.
BACKGROUND: Patients with secondary peritonitis often require
relaparotomy; however, there is no consensus about the criteria for
selecting patients who would benefit from early relaparotomy. Our goal
was to evaluate whether elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during
the early postoperative period could predict the need for relaparotomy.
METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive adult patients with acute
intra-abdominal conditions were admitted for laparotomy. Seventy-eight
patients, who were diagnosed with secondary peritonitis at index
surgery, underwent serial measurements of IAP. The primary outcomes
measured in the study were incidence of postoperative peritonitis and
mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 78 patients with secondary peritonitis
(41%) developed elevated IAP postoperatively. Sixteen (20.5%) of 78
patients developed postoperative peritonitis. Twelve of these 16
patients (75%) with postoperative peritonitis had significantly elevated
IAP (P = 0.002) during the immediate postoperative period. Regression
analysis revealed elevated IAP (P = 0.055) to be third most predictive
of postoperative peritonitis in patients who underwent laparotomy for
secondary peritonitis, after septic shock at admission (P = 0.012) and
POSSUM score (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that development
of elevated IAP during the early postoperative period can increase the
risk of postoperative peritonitis. IAP measured during the immediate
postoperative period can be used as a predictor of early relaparotomy.
Bee, T. K., M. A. Croce, et al. (2008). "Temporary abdominal
closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin
910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure." J Trauma
65(2): 337-42; discussion
342-4.
OBJECTIVE: The options for abdominal coverage after damage
control laparotomy or abdominal compartment syndrome vary by
institution, surgeon preference, and type of patient. Some advocate
polyglactin mesh (MESH), while others favor vacuum-assisted closure
(VAC). We performed a single institution prospective randomized trial
comparing morbidity and mortality differences between MESH and VAC.
METHODS: Patients expected to survive and requiring open abdomen
management were prospectively randomized to either MESH or VAC. After
randomization, an enteral feeding tube was inserted and the closure
device placed. VAC patients returned to the operating room every 3 days
for a total of three changes at which time polyglactin mesh was placed
if closure was not possible. The MESH group had twice daily assessments
for the possibility of bedside mesh cinching and closure. Both groups
underwent split thickness skin grafting when granulation tissue was
evident, if delayed primary closure was not possible. RESULTS: Fifty-one
patients were randomized. Both cohorts were matched for Injury Severity
Scale score, gender, blunt/penetrating/abdominal compartment syndrome
and age. Three patients died within 7 days and were excluded from
closure rate calculation. There were no differences between delayed
primary fascial closure rates in the VAC (31%) or MESH (26%) groups. The
fistula rate in the VAC group was 21% but not statistically different
from the 5% rate for MESH. Intraabdominal rates were not statistically
different. All VAC fistulas were related to feeding tubes and suture
line areas; the MESH fistula followed a retroperitoneal colon leak
remote from the mesh. CONCLUSIONS: MESH and VAC are both useful methods
for abdominal coverage, and are equally likely to produce delayed
primary closure. The fistula rate for VAC is most likely due to
continued bowel manipulation with VAC changes with a feeding tube in
place-enteral feeds should be administered via nasojejunal tube. Neither
method precludes secondary abdominal wall reconstruction.
Beltran, M. A., R. A. Villar, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
compartment syndrome in patients with strangulated hernia." Hernia.
BACKGROUND: Intestinal obstruction (IO) leads to increased
intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal compartment syndrome. The purpose
of this study was to investigate the characteristics of abdominal
compartment syndrome in patients with IO secondary to strangulated
hernia. METHODS: We studied 81 consecutive unselected patients
presenting complicated hernias and IO. We measured intra-abdominal
pressure using the intra-vesicular pressure method. RESULTS:
Preoperative (15 min) intra-abdominal pressure was higher in patients
with strangulated hernias. Postoperative (15 min) intra-abdominal
pressure in both groups decreased to similar values. Intra-abdominal
pressure was measured during the preoperative period in patients with
strangulated hernias and during the postoperative period at 15 min (13.8
+/- 6.4 mmHg), 24 h (9.8 +/- 3.2 mmHg) and 48 h (7.4 +/- 2.4 mmHg).
Abdominal compartment syndrome developed in 47% cases with strangulated
hernias with a mortality of five patients. CONCLUSIONS: Serial
measurements of intra-abdominal pressure evidenced the clinical severity
of strangulated hernia. Intra-abdominal pressure measurement may be used
as a predictor of intestinal strangulation in patients presenting acute
abdominal compartment syndrome secondary to complicated hernia.
Benninger, E., L. Labler, et al. (2008). "In vitro comparison
of intra-abdominal hypertension development after different temporary
abdominal closure techniques." J Surg Res
144(1): 102-6.
BACKGROUND: To compare volume reserve capacity (VRC) and
development of intra-abdominal hypertension after different in vitro
temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques. METHODS: A model of the
abdomen was designed. The abdominal wall was simulated with
polychloroprene, a synthetic rubber compound. A lentil-shaped defect of
150 cm(2) was cut into the anterior aspect of the abdominal wall. TAC of
this defect was performed by a zipper system (ZS), a bag silo closure
(BSC), or a vacuum assisted closure (VAC) with subatmospheric pressures
ranging from 0- to 200 mmHg. The model with intact abdominal wall served
as reference. The model was filled with water to baseline level. The
intra-abdominal pressure was increased in 2 mmHg steps from baseline
level (6 mmHg) to 40 mmHg by adding volume to the system according to a
standardized protocol. VRC with corresponding intra-abdominal pressure
were analyzed and compared for the different TAC techniques. RESULTS:
VRC was the highest after BSC at all pressure levels studied (P < 0.05).
VAC and ZS resulted in significantly lower VRC compared with BSC and
reference (P < 0.05). The magnitude of negative pressure on the VAC did
not significantly influence the VRC. CONCLUSIONS: In the present in
vitro model, BSC demonstrated the highest VRC of all evaluated TAC
techniques. Different levels of subatmospheric pressures applied to the
VAC did not affect VRC. The results for ZS and VAC indicate that these
TAC techniques may increase the risk for recurrent intra-abdominal
hypertension and should therefore not be used in high-risk patients
during the initial phase after abdominal decompression.
Biancofiore, G. and M. L. Bindi (2008). "Measurement and
knowledge of intra-abdominal pressure in Italian Intensive Care Units."
Minerva Anestesiol 74(1-2):
5-9.
BACKGROUND: With this survey, we aimed at investigating the
knowledge, recognition and management of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
and abdominal hypertension (IAH) in Italian Intensive Care Units.
METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the ''Intensive Care Unit lead
physician'' of 114 italian hospitals. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen
questionnaires were sent, and 77 (67.5%) of them were returned
completed. IAP was measured in 51 Units (66.3%). The most frequent
reasons for not measuring IAP were the lack of a specific IAP monitoring
kit (34.6%) and not knowing how to make the measurement (23.0%). Urinary
bladder pressure was the only method used to measure IAP, the most
frequent timing for IAP measurements was once every 4 h. An IAP value of
15 mmHg was considered to be the threshold for IAH in 33.4% of the
cases, whereas in 31.4% of cases it was 20 mmHg. The presence of risk
factors for IAH (64.7%) and a previous urgent surgery (21.5 %) were
indicators of IAP monitoring. Diagnosis of IAH prompted a surgical
consultation and evaluation, also in view of a possible abdominal
decompression in 64.7 % of cases. More than half (54.9%, n=28) of the 51
ICUs where IAP was measured reported to be unaware of the World Society
of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. CONCLUSION: Italian intensive
care unit physicians show a certain interest towards IAP monitoring and
its implications in the management of critically ill patients. However,
IAP, IAH and abdominal compartment syndrome still require greater basic
understanding.
Bjorck, M., A. Wanhainen, et al. (2008). "The clinical
importance of monitoring intra-abdominal pressure after ruptured
abdominal aortic aneurysm repair." Scand J Surg
97(2): 183-90.
AIM: The aim of this paper was to review the literature on the
clinical importance of monitoring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) after
ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. METHOD: The literature
was searched for abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) or intra-abdominal
pressure and aortic aneurysm. Original articles were studied. Personal
experiences were reported. RESULTS: The Consensus Documents of the World
Society on the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (wsacs.org), with their
definitions and guidelines, constitute an important step forward for the
possibilities to study this clinical entity. Few papers were published
describing the problem specifically in the patient population operated
on for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). The incidence was
approximately 5% when the patients were not monitored with IAP, and
above 10% when IAP was monitored. The incidence seems to be similar
irrespective if open or endovascular repair is performed, though
comparative prospective studies were not published. Patients with
intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) or ACS have higher mortality and more
complications. If IAH is recognized early conservative treatment may be
effective to prevent development of ACS. After ACS has developed,
surgical decompression is usually required. A proposed algorithm on how
to act on different levels of IAH is presented. CONCLUSIONS: IAH/ACS is
an important complication after operation on patients with rAAA.
Monitoring IAP may be associated with improved outcomes.
Bodnar, Z., S. Sipka, et al. (2008). "The abdominal
compartment syndrome (ACS) in general surgery."
Hepatogastroenterology 55(88):
2033-8.
BACKGROUND: The abdominal compartment syndrome is a life
threatening clinical entity which can develop within the first 12 hours
of intensive care unit admission in high-risk surgical patients. The aim
of this paper is to show the definitions, ethiology, pathophysiology,
diagnosis and treatment of this serious, not only surgical problem.
METHODOLOGY: The mortality due to the abdominal compartment syndrome is
extremely high (38-71%). It can be defined as adverse physiologic
consequences that occur as a result of an acute increase in the
intraabdominal pressure. The most common causes are retroperitoneal
haemorrhage, visceral oedema, pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, tense
ascites, peritonitis, tumor. The mostly affected systems are
cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, central nervous systems and splanchnic
organs. The gold standard diagnostic method is the continuous
intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. The treatment consists of adequate
fluid resuscitation and surgical decompression. RESULTS: We show three
typical short case reports treated by the above mentioned theories.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment
syndrome are frequent clinical findings among acute general surgical
patients. Patients with comparable demographics and acute severity of
illness are more likely to die if intraabdominal hypertension or
abdominal compartment syndrome is present. We conclude that the early
recognition and surgical decompression is urgent.
Burke, B. A. and B. A. Latenser (2008). "Defining
intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in acute
thermal injury: a multicenter survey." J Burn Care Res
29(4): 580-4.
The definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and
abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are not uniform despite the
increasing awareness of IAH/ACS in burn patients. A short survey
including definitions, resuscitation protocols, and monitoring practices
was sent to every physician listed in the American Burn Association
Directory. Thirty-two of 123 (26%) surveys were returned; 22 (69%) were
from verified burn centers. Survey respondents said that bladder
pressure indicating IAH is 19.6 mm Hg (range 12-30) and ACS is 25.9 mm
Hg (range 15-40). Fifteen percentage of those responding do not include
clinical sequellae in their definition of ACS. Bladder pressure is not
routinely measured by 22 (69%) burn physicians, and staff at 17 centers
(53%) wait until the abdomen is tense to measure abdominal pressure.
Tense abdomen, along with elevated peak inspiratory pressures (PIP), is
used in most centers (94%) to determine IAH/ACS, followed by oliguria
(88%), and difficulty ventilating (78%). Resuscitation formulae used are
primarily the Parkland/modified Parkland in 24 (75%) burn centers.
Criteria for abdominal decompression is based on bladder pressures alone
in 25 centers (78%); 16/32 (50%) use PIP, and 10/32 (31%) staff use
other criteria including organ dysfunction or increased lactate. Eleven
physicians (34%) advocate percutaneous decompression before
decompressive laparotomy. Although most United States burn physicians
define ACS as >or=25 mm Hg along with physiologic compromise, bladder
pressure is routinely measured by only 31% of burn physicians. Most burn
staff do not differentiate between IAH and ACS. Consensus definitions of
IAH/ACS are necessary for burn care practitioners to compare research
studies and discuss outcomes. Concise definitions will promote
understanding of the pathophysiological processes involved and allow us
to develop data-driven patient care protocols.
Cardia, G., A. Centonze, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
compartment syndrome: a situation thet needs to be better known."
Chir Ital 60(3): 381-9.
Abdominal compartment syndrome was initially described as a
cascade of physiopathological events triggered by the increase in
intra-abdominal pressure induced by a surgical procedure for aneurysm of
the abdominal aorta. In practice, it is a complication that can arise
after various procedures; it has a multi-organ impact and can lead to
exitus. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 9 patients with abdominal
compartment syndrome. In 5 cases onset of the syndrome was due to a
secondary complication of a vascular procedure (3 mesenteric, 2 renal).
The clinical data characterizing the disease included abdominal
distension and reduced diuresis. In all cases the finding of increased
necrosis scores (LDH, CPK) was evident, while the appearance of
leukocytosis occurred only in 4 (44%). The basic treatment was surgical
decompression. In one case we obtained an excellent result with medical
treatment alone, consisting in steroids and PGE1; these were useful in
all cases in which an inflammatory bowel component played a role. Our
experience encourages us to stress the importance of early assessment of
abdominal hypertension in patients with a potential risk of abdominal
compartment syndrome. In this phase, appropriate medical and supportive
treatment could limit the surgical indications or at any rate favour the
healing process after surgical decompression, the basic treatment
indicated for this syndrome.
Cheatham, M. L. (2008). "Are children really just small
adults?" Crit Care Med 36(7):
2215-6.
Cheatham, M. L. (2008). "Intraabdominal pressure monitoring
during fluid resuscitation." Curr Opin Crit Care
14(3): 327-33.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Elevated intraabdominal pressure is commonly
encountered in the critically ill, has detrimental effects on all organ
systems, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
Serial intraabdominal pressure measurements are essential to the
diagnosis, management, and fluid resuscitation of patients who develop
intraabdominal hypertension and/or abdominal compartment syndrome.
RECENT FINDINGS: Over the past year, the importance of intraabdominal
pressure measurements and their accurate determination has been further
defined. Several nonoperative therapies have been demonstrated to reduce
the morbidity and mortality of intraabdominal hypertension/abdominal
compartment syndrome, all of which are guided by measurements of
intraabdominal pressure. The World Society of the Abdominal Compartment
Syndrome has published evidence-based medicine consensus guidelines for
the measurement of intraabdominal pressure and its utilization in the
diagnosis and resuscitation of the critically ill. SUMMARY: Serial
intraabdominal pressure measurements are essential for the diagnosis and
management of intraabdominal hypertension/abdominal compartment
syndrome. Intraabdominal pressure must be measured accurately and
utilized in a goal-directed fashion to guide fluid and end-organ
resuscitation. As a result of its ability to predict survival among the
critically ill, intraabdominal pressure should be routinely monitored in
the patient who demonstrates risk factors for intraabdominal
hypertension/abdominal compartment syndrome.
Cheatham, M. L. (2008). "Resuscitation end points in severe
sepsis: central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, mixed venous
oxygen saturation, and... intra-abdominal pressure." Crit Care Med
36(3): 1012-4.
Severe sepsis is widely recognized as a significant cause of
morbidity and mortality in the critically ill. The appropriate treatment
strategy has long been the subject of controversy and has centered on
the pros and cons of crystalloid vs. colloid, fluids vs. vasopressors,
and steroids vs. no steroids. In recent years, however, an algorithmic
evidence-based approach to the treatment of severe sepsis has been
advocated by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and broadly adopted
worldwide. This strategy includes the use of goal directed fluid and
norepinephrine administration to restore systemic perfusion and
oxygenation and ultimately improve patient survival. Resuscitation end
points, such as central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and
mixed venous oxygen saturation, are central to this approach.
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), or elevated intra-abdominal pressure
(IAP), and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), the development of
organ dysfunction and failure secondary to IAH, have similarly gained
increasing, though less noticeable, recognition as causes of morbidity
and mortality in a variety of different patient populations.
Severe sepsis and IAH/ACS share many of the same risk factors and are
frequently encountered concurrently within the same patient. The World
Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome has recently published
consensus definitions and recommendations that include
evidence-based–medicine assessment and management algorithms for the
resuscitation of patients with IAH/ACS (available at:
http://www.wsacs.org). This treatment strategy represents an organ
systems– based approach designed to reduce IAP and its injurious effects
and to ensure adequate systemic perfusion and organ function. Prominent
in this approach are the judicious administration of fluid to avoid
resuscitation-induced visceral edema and elevated IAP, the early
application of vasopressor therapy to maintain systemic perfusion, and
the use of surgical decompression for IAH/ACS refractory to less
invasive therapies. This management strategy for patients with early
IAH/ACS has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the associated
mortality of elevated IAP and the need for emergent surgical
decompression of the abdomen. The relatively new resuscitation end
points of IAP and abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) (calculated as mean
arterial pressure minus IAP) are central to this approach. Maintenance
of an APP greater than 50–60 mm Hg has been demonstrated to predict
patient survival from IAH/ACS.
Given their mutual risk factors, severe sepsis and IAH/ACS should be
carefully sought and, when present, aggressively treated to reduce their
similar morbidity and mortality. Patients should be screened for IAH/ACS
risk factors at intensive care unit admission and in the presence of new
or progressive organ failure. If IAH is present, serial IAP measurements
should be performed throughout the patient’s critical illness. APP
should be maintained above 50–60 mm Hg. Combination therapy using both
crystalloids/colloids and vasopressors should be employed, carefully
titrated to central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, mixed
venous oxygen saturation, and IAP to ensure restoration of end-organ
perfusion and function while minimizing the detrimental effects of over
resuscitation. This approach is consistent both with the current
Surviving Sepsis Campaign and World Society of the Abdominal Compartment
Syndrome resuscitation algorithms.
Cheatham, M. L. and J. Fowler (2008). "Measuring
intra-abdominal pressure outside the ICU: validation of a simple bedside
method." Am Surg 74(9):
806-8.
Intra-abdominal pressure measurement is essential to the
diagnosis of patients with intraabdominal hypertension or abdominal
compartment syndrome. The most common method for measuring
intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is the intravesicular or "bladder"
technique, which requires electronic monitoring technology not available
on the typical surgical ward. Herein we describe and validate a simple,
rapid screening method for bedside IAP measurement using the patient's
indwelling urinary catheter and a readily available intravenous tubing
extension. Validation of this technique across the clinically important
IAP diagnostic spectrum demonstrated acceptable bias (1.6 mm Hg; 95%
confidence interval 1.4-1.8) with limits of agreement of 0.36 to 2.8.
This demonstrates good agreement between the two IAP methods and
validates the bedside technique as a simple, cost-effective, and
reproducible method for screening IAP measurements outside of the
critical care setting.
Cheatham, M. L., J. Fowler, et al. (2008). "Subcutaneous
linea alba fasciotomy: a less morbid treatment for abdominal compartment
syndrome." Am Surg 74(8):
746-9.
Abdominal compartment syndrome is a cause of significant
morbidity and mortality among surgical patients. It has traditionally
been treated by abdominal decompression with the associated risks of
chronic incisional hernia and enteroatmospheric fistula. Subcutaneous
linea alba fasciotomy has recently been described as a new surgical
technique for the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome secondary
to acute pancreatitis. This technique reduces intraabdominal pressure
and restores organ function while maintaining the skin and peritoneum
intact for visceral protection. We describe the application of
subcutaneous linea alba fasciotomy as a safe and effective alternative
for the surgical management of abdominal compartment syndrome in a
traumatically injured patient refractory to comprehensive medical
interventions.
Cheatham, M. L. and K. Safcsak (2008). "Longterm impact of
abdominal decompression: a prospective comparative analysis." J Am
Coll Surg 207(4): 573-9.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal decompression is widely used to treat
end-organ dysfunction associated with intraabdominal hypertension (IAH)
and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The longterm impact of
abdominal decompression on physical and mental health, quality of life,
and subsequent employment remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective
cohort study was performed at a tertiary referral/Level I trauma center.
All patients who required abdominal decompression for more than 48 hours
were asked to complete the SF-36v2 health survey at regular intervals
for 2 years postdecompression. Patients discharged with a chronic
incisional hernia (OPEN) were compared with those discharged with
primary fascial closure (CLOSED) and with the general population.
Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and successful return to employment
were determined. RESULTS: From June 2002 to May 2005, 245 consecutive
patients required abdominal decompression for intraabdominal
hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Forty-four patients (30
OPEN, 14 CLOSED) met inclusion criteria and completed their health
surveys. At 6 months postdecompression, physical and social functioning
were significantly decreased among OPEN, but not CLOSED, patients when
compared with the general population. By 18 months, OPEN patients
demonstrated normal physical and mental health perception. OPEN and
CLOSED patients exhibited decreased, but identical, quality-adjusted
life years (1.20+/-0.11 versus 1.23+/-0.25 [mean +/- SD]; p=0.39) and
similar ability to resume employment (41% versus 55%; p=0.49).
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal decompression does not have a negative impact on
longterm physical or mental health perception. Quality of life and
ability to resume employment are not improved by same-admission primary
fascial closure. Abdominal decompression is not as debilitating and life
altering as might be expected.
Chen, H., F. Li, et al. (2008). "Abdominal compartment
syndrome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis in early stage."
World J Gastroenterol 14(22):
3541-8.
AIM: To study retrospectively the influence of intra-abdominal
hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients
with early acute pancreatitis (AP) (during the first week after
admission) on physiological functions, and the association of the
presence of IAH/ACS and outcome. METHODS: Patients (n = 74) with AP
recruited in this study were divided into two groups according to
intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) determined by indirect measurement using
the transvesical route via Foley bladder catheter during the first week
after admission. Patients (n = 44) with IAP >= 12 mmHg were assigned in
IAH group, and the remaining patients (n = 30) with IAP < 12 mmHg in
normal IAP group. For analysis of the influence of IAH/ACS on organ
function and outcome, the physiological parameters and the occurrence of
organ dysfunction during intensive care unit (ICU) stay were recorded,
as were the incidences of pancreatic infection and in-hospital
mortality. RESULTS: IAH within the first week after admission was found
in 44 patients (59.46%). Although the APACHE II scores on admission and
the Ranson scores within 48 h after hospitalization were elevated in IAH
patients in early stage, they did not show the statistically significant
differences from patients with normal IAP within a week after admission
(16.18 +/- 3.90 vs 15.70 +/- 4.25, P = 0.616; 3.70 +/- 0.93 vs 3.47 +/-
0.94, P = 0.285, respectively). ACS in early AP was recorded in 20
patients (27.03%). During any 24-h period of the first week after
admission, the recorded mean IAP correlated significantly with the
Marshall score calculated at the same time interval in IAH group (r =
0.635, P < 0.001). Although ACS patients had obvious amelioration in
physiological variables within 24 h after decompression, the incidences
of pancreatitic infection, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction
syndrome (MODS) and death in the patients with ACS were significantly
higher than that in other patients without ACS (pancreatitic infection:
60.0% vs 7.4%, P < 0.001; septic shock: 70.0% vs 11.1%, P < 0.001; MODS:
90.0% vs 31.5%, P < 0.001; mortality: 75.0% vs 3.7%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: IAH/ACS is a frequent finding in patients admitted to the
ICU because of AP. Patients with IAP at approximately 10-12 mmHg and
early signs of changes in physiologic variables should be seriously
considered for urgent decompression to improve survival.
Choi, J. Y., P. Burton, et al. (2008). "Abdominal compartment
syndrome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm." ANZ J Surg
78(8): 648-53.
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is an increasingly
recognized syndrome of intra-abdominal hypertension and generalized
physiological dysfunction in critically ill patients. Patients suffering
a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) are at risk of developing
ACS. The objective of the study was to compare the current views on the
importance, prevalence and management of ACS after rAAA among Australian
vascular surgeons and intensivists. A questionnaire was mailed to 116
registered vascular fellows from the Royal Australasian College of
Surgeons and 314 registered fellows of the Joint Faculty of Intensive
Care Medicine. Data were collected on the prevalence and importance of
ACS after rAAA and whether prophylactic measures were or should be taken
to prevent ACS. Hypothetical clinical scenarios representing a range of
ACS after rAAA were also presented. The responses were compared using
chi(2)-test and t-test. Sixty-seven per cent (78 of 116) of surgeons and
39% (122 of 314) of intensivists responded. Both groups estimated the
prevalence of ACS after rAAA as between 10 and 30% and considered it an
important entity. Only 30% of surgeons and 50% of intensivists suggested
routine intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring. In patients with
borderline IAP (18 mmHg), both groups believed that surgical
intervention was unnecessary. Intensivists were more inclined to suggest
surgical intervention for clinically deteriorating patients with an
increased IAP (30 mmHg) compared with surgeons. Forty-three per cent of
intensivists and 17% of surgeons suggested prophylactic (leaving the
abdomen open) measures to prevent ACS in high-risk patients. Surgeons
and intensivists have similar views on the prevalence and clinical
importance of ACS after rAAA. Intensivists more frequently monitored IAP
and suggested both early prophylactic and therapeutic intervention for
ACS based on physiological and IAP findings.
Dalfino, L., L. Tullo, et al. (2008). "Intra-abdominal
hypertensionand acute renal failurein critically ill patients."
Intensive Care Med 34(4):
707-13.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between
intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and acute renal failure (ARF) in
critically ill patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational
study in a general intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients consecutively
admitted for[Symbol: see text]>[Symbol: see text]24[Symbol: see text]h
during a 6-month period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:
Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured through the urinary bladder
pressure measurement method. The IAH was defined as a IAP >/=12[Symbol:
see text]mmHg in at least two consecutive measurements performed at 24-h
intervals. The ARF was defined as the failure class of the RIFLE
classification. Of 123 patients, 37 (30.1%) developed IAH. Twenty-three
patients developed ARF (with an overall incidence of 19%), 16 (43.2%) in
IAH and 7 (8.1%) in non-IAH group (p[Symbol: see text]<[Symbol: see
text]0.05). Shock (p[Symbol: see text]<[Symbol: see text]0.001), IAH
(p[Symbol: see text]=[Symbol: see text]0.002) and low abdominal
perfusion pressure (APP; p[Symbol: see text]=[Symbol: see text]0.046)
resulted as the best predictive factors for ARF. The optimum cut-off
point of IAP for ARF development was 12[Symbol: see text]mmHg, with a
sensitivity of 91.3% and a specificity of 67%. The best cut-off values
of APP and filtration gradient (FG) for ARF development were 52 and
38[Symbol: see text]mmHg, respectively. Age(p[Symbol: see text]=[Symbol:
see text]0.002), cumulative fluid balance (p[Symbol: see text]=[Symbol:
see text]0.002) and shock (p[Symbol: see text]=[Symbol: see text]0.006)
were independent predictive factors of IAH. Raw hospital mortality rate
was significantly higher in patients with IAH; however, risk-adjusted
and O/E ratio mortality rates were not different between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients IAH is an independent predictive
factor of ARF at IAP levels as low as 12[Symbol: see text]mmHg, although
the contribution of impaired systemic haemodynamics should also be
considered.
De Laet, I., E. Hoste, et al. (2008). "Transvesical
intra-abdominal pressure measurement using minimal instillation volumes:
how low can we go?" Intensive Care Med
34(4): 746-50.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimal instillation volume at which
an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) curve can be obtained and to compare
this with the IAP measured at 20[Symbol: see text]ml instilled volume.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in the Intensive Care Unit
of Ghent University Hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five critically ill
sedated and ventilated patients at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension
(IAH). INTERVENTIONS: IAP was measured transvesically using a
custom-designed IAP monitoring set. Measurement was started without any
additional instillation of saline and was continued at 1-ml increments
up to 10[Symbol: see text]ml. Finally, IAP was measured with 20[Symbol:
see text]ml instillation volume. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: After each
instillation an "oscillation test" was performed. The minimal volume at
which the oscillation test was positive was recorded. These values were
compared to the IAP obtained using 20[Symbol: see text]ml saline
(IAP(20[Symbol: see text]ml)). At 2[Symbol: see text]ml installed saline
volume an oscillation curve could be obtained in all patients. Mean
IAP(2[Symbol: see text]ml) was 11.2[Symbol: see text]+/-[Symbol: see
text]3.2[Symbol: see text]mmHg, IAP(10[Symbol: see text]ml) 11.4[Symbol:
see text]+/-[Symbol: see text]3.7[Symbol: see text]mmHg, and
IAP(20[Symbol: see text]ml) 11.7[Symbol: see text]+/-[Symbol: see
text]3.2[Symbol: see text]mmHg. In four patients (16%) there was a
clinically significant difference of 2[Symbol: see text]mmHg or more
between IAP(2[Symbol: see text]ml) and IAP(20[Symbol: see text]ml). The
mean difference between IAP(20[Symbol: see text]ml) and IAP(2[Symbol:
see text]ml) was 0.60[Symbol: see text]+/-[Symbol: see text]0.91[Symbol:
see text]mmHg (95% CI 0.22-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of
patients at risk for IAH 2[Symbol: see text]ml saline was sufficient for
IAP signal transduction. Higher volumes for transvesical IAP measurement
resulted in higher pressure readings in some patients.
De Laet, I. E., M. Ravyts, et al. (2008). "Current insights
in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open
the abdomen and keep it open!" Langenbecks Arch Surg.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is
associated with organ dysfunction and mortality in critically ill
patients. Furthermore, the deleterious effects of increased IAP have
been shown to occur at levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
previously deemed to be safe. The aim of this article is to provide an
overview of all aspects of this underrecognized pathological syndrome
for surgeons. METHODS AND CONTENTS: This review article will focus
primarily on the recent literature on ACS as well as the definitions and
recommendations published by the World Society for the Abdominal
Compartment Syndrome. The definitions regarding increased IAP will be
listed, followed by a brief but comprehensive overview of the different
mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with intra-abdominal
hypertension (IAH). Measurement techniques for IAP will be discussed, as
well as recommendations for organ function support in patients with IAH.
Finally, surgical treatment and management of the open abdomen are
briefly discussed, as well as some minimally invasive techniques to
decrease IAP. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS was first described in surgical
patients with abdominal trauma, bleeding, or infection, but in recent
years ACS has also been described in patients with other pathologies
such as burn injury and sepsis. Some of these so-called nonsurgical
patients will require surgery to treat their ACS. This review article is
intended to provide surgeons with a clear insight into the current state
of knowledge regarding IAH, ACS, and the impact of IAP on the critically
ill patient.
De Waele, J. J., I. De Laet, et al. (2008). "The effect of
different reference transducer positions on intra-abdominal pressure
measurement: a multicenter analysis." Intensive Care Med
34(7): 1299-303.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different reference
transducer positions on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement.
Three reference levels were studied: the symphysis pubis; the
phlebostatic axis; and the midaxillary line at the level of the iliac
crest. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The intensive care
units of participating hospitals PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred
thirty-two critically ill patients at risk for intra-abdominal
hypertension (IAH). INTERVENTIONS: In each patient, three sets of IAP
measurements were obtained in the supine position, using the different
reference levels. The IAP measurements obtained at the different
reference levels were compared using a paired t-test and Bland-Altman
statistics were calculated. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: IAP(phlebostatic)
(9.9[Symbol: see text]+/-[Symbol: see text]4.67[Symbol: see text]mmHg)
and IAP(pubis) (8.4[Symbol: see text]+/-[Symbol: see text]4.60[Symbol:
see text]mmHg) were significantly lower that IAP(midax) (12.2[Symbol:
see text]+/-[Symbol: see text]4.66[Symbol: see text]mmHg; p[Symbol: see
text]<[Symbol: see text]0.0001 for both comparisons). The bias between
the IAP(midax) and IAP(pubis) was 3.8[Symbol: see text]mmHg (95%[Symbol:
see text]CI 3.5-4.1) and 2.3[Symbol: see text]mmHg (95%[Symbol: see
text]CI 1.9-2.6) between the IAP(midax) and the IAP(phlebostatic). The
precision was 3.03 and 3.40, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the supine
position, IAP(midax) is higher than both IAP(phlebostatic) and
IAP(pubis), differences found to be clinically significant; therefore,
the symphysis pubis or phlebostatic axis reference lines are not
interchangeable with the midaxillary level.
De Wolf, A., J. Poelaert, et al. (2008). "Surgical
decompression for abdominal compartment syndrome after emergency cardiac
surgery." Ann Thorac Surg
85(6): 2133-5.
Abdominal compartment syndrome typically occurs in patients after
abdominal surgical procedures or trauma. Abdominal compartment syndrome
is also increasingly described in conditions not related to abdominal
operations, such as fluid resuscitation or burns. We report two patients
who required surgical abdominal decompression for abdominal compartment
syndrome that developed early after emergency coronary artery bypass
graft surgery. No intraabdominal abnormalities were found at operation.
Both patients had a protracted clinical course, but they survived and
were discharged from the hospital.
Deenichin, G. P. (2008). "Abdominal compartment syndrome."
Surg Today 38(1): 5-19.
Compartment syndrome is a pathophysiological term, comprising a
variety of tissues and organ alterations, due to a higher than normal
pressure in an anatomically detached space (compartment). In the human
body, areas denoted as compartments include the orbital globe, the sub
and epidural space, the abdomen, pleura, pericardium, and others.
Compartment syndrome was described initially in limbs. Abdominal
compartment syndrome is defined as an intra-abdominal pressure above 20
mmHg with evidence of organ failure. Abdominal compartment syndrome
develops when the intra-abdominal pressure rapidly reaches certain
pathological values, within several hours (intra-abdominal hypertension
is observed), and lasts for 6 or more hours. The key to recognizing
abdominal compartment syndrome is the demonstration of elevated
intra-abdominal pressure which is performed most often via the urinary
bladder, and it is considered to be the "gold standard." Multiorgan
failure includes damage to the cardiac, pulmonary, renal, neurological,
gastrointestinal, abdominal wall, and ophthalmic systems. The gut is the
most sensitive to intra-abdominal hypertension, and it develops evidence
of end-organ damage before alterations are observed in other systems.
The surgical decompression of the abdomen remains the treatment of
choice of abdominal compartment syndrome; this usually improves the
organ changes, and is followed by one of the temporary abdominal closure
techniques in order to prevent secondary intra-abdominal hypertension.
Deenichin, G. P., R. S. Dimov, et al. (2008). "Acute
perforated diverticulitis of the colon as a rare cause for development
of abdominal compartment syndrome." Folia Med (Plovdiv)
50(2): 32-6.
AIM: The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the
surgical approaches to acute perforated diverticulitis of the colon
causing peritonitis and in some cases complicated with abdominal
compartment syndrome (ACS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of eight
patients (6 males and 2 females) have been operated on for 5 years for
perforated diverticulum of the colon. The males had a mean age of 72 +/-
2.6 years and the females--69 +/- 3.1 years. Case history records of the
patients were studied retrospectively to evaluate the effectiveness of
different surgical approaches used in patients with such disorders. The
females had perforation of cecal diverticulum, five of the males had
perforated diverticulum of the sigmoid colon and one had perforation of
diverticulum of the descending colon. The diagnosis in all patients was
made intraoperatively and only in two cases was it assumed prior to
operation. In the female patient with cecal pathology right-sided
hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis was performed. In the other six
patients Hartmann's procedure was applied with a subsequent second-stage
intervention to restore the intestinal continuity. RESULTS: Total
feculent peritonitis was found in four of the patients with perforated
diverticulum of the sigmoid colon, with signs of multiorgan failure,
intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH >25 cm H2O level) and developed ACS.
Despite the severity of the condition there was no lethal outcome. Two
patients developed incisional hernia on the anterior abdominal wall.
CONCLUSION: Based on the retrospective clinical analysis the authors
conclude that primary hemicolectomy with one-stage anastomosis is the
best procedure in patients in good condition and early stage on Hinchey
classification. Total feculent peritonitis, associated with stage IV on
Hinchey classification and signs of ACS requires Hartmann's procedure,
following the principles of damage control surgery with obligatory use
of temporary abdominal closure technique to control the syndrome and
prevent a secondary one in the postoperative period. The indirect
intravesical method of verification of IAH and ACS (the golden standard)
is sufficiently precise for the clinical practice.
Drekonja, D. M., M. A. Kuskowski, et al. (2008).
"Antimicrobial urinary catheters: a systematic review." Expert Rev
Med Devices 5(4):
495-506.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a common
occurrence, often clinically unapparent and with a benign course.
However, in a small fraction of patients catheter-associated
bacteriuria/funguria (CABF) produces overt clinical manifestations and
adverse consequences, including (at the extreme end of the spectrum)
urosepsis and death. Antimicrobial-coated catheters have been proposed
as a method to prevent CAUTI and are in use worldwide, although their
clinical efficacy is not well known. Randomized and quasi-randomized
clinical trials have demonstrated that antimicrobial-coated catheters do
decrease the incidence of CABF; however, evidence that such devices
provide clinically meaningful benefit is lacking. Moreover, uncertainty
exists as to which of the currently marketed catheters is most effective
against CABF, since no published trial has directly compared different
antimicrobial-coated catheters. We conducted a systematic review to
summarize and evaluate existing evidence, and to address areas of
uncertainty. We found consistent but variable evidence that
antimicrobial-coated catheters prevent CABF during short-term
catheterization; however, no study demonstrated a clinical benefit.
Future efforts in this field should include randomized trials with
clinically relevant end points, as well as research to develop improved
mechanisms for bladder drainage, preferably without the risks and
discomfort currently associated with urinary catheters.
Ejike, J. C., K. Bahjri, et al. (2008). "What is the normal
intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill children and how should we
measure it?" Crit Care Med
36(7): 2157-62.
INTRODUCTION: The intravesical method has been validated and is
considered the gold standard for indirect intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
measurements. In adults, a standard volume (25 mL) is instilled into the
bladder to measure IAP. However, the optimal volume for accurate IAP
measurements in children has not been well studied and using
inappropriate volumes could give erroneous IAP readings. OBJECTIVE: To
determine the normal IAP in critically ill children and the optimal
volume for IAP measurement by the intravesical method in this
population. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary
pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Ninety-six mechanically
ventilated children younger than 18 yrs of age with no clinical evidence
of intra-abdominal hypertension. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Graduated
volumes of normal saline in increments of 3-50 mL were instilled in the
bladder via a urethral catheter. IAP was recorded by using the AbViser
device (WolfeTory Medical, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) with each
instillation. A pressure-volume curve was generated for every patient,
and the minimum and mean optimal volumes were determined from this
curve. Data were analyzed by stratification of patients according to
weights 0-10 kg, >10-20 kg, and >20-50 kg. Descriptive statistics was
used for statistical analysis. Normal IAP for critically ill children
was 7 +/- 3 and was similar in the different weight groups (p = .745).
Although the mean optimal volume to measure accurate IAP was variable in
the different weight groups, the minimum optimal volume was 3 mL
irrespective of weight. CONCLUSIONS: Mean IAP in critically ill children
is 7 +/- 3 mm Hg. The minimum optimal volume needed to accurately
measure IAP by the intravesical method in children is 3 mL. We recommend
that 3 mL be the standard instillation volume for IAP measurement by the
intravesical method in children. IAP >10 mm Hg should be considered
elevated in children.
Ennis, J. L., K. K. Chung, et al. (2008). "Joint Theater
Trauma System implementation of burn resuscitation guidelines improves
outcomes in severely burned military casualties." J Trauma
64(2 Suppl): S146-51;
discussion S151-2.
BACKGROUND: Between March 2003 and June 2007, our burn center
received 594 casualties from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ongoing acute burn resuscitation as severely burned casualties are
evacuated over continents is very challenging. To help standardize care,
burn resuscitation guidelines (BRG) were devised along with a burn flow
sheet (BFS) and disseminated via the new operational Joint Theater
Trauma System to assist deployed providers. METHODS: After the BRG was
implemented in January 2006, BRF data were prospectively collected in
consecutive military casualties with >30% total body surface area (TBSA)
burns (BRG Group). Baseline demographic data and fluid requirements for
the first 24 hours of the burn resuscitation were collected from the
BFS. Percentage full thickness TBSA burns, presence of inhalation
injury, injury severity score, resuscitation-related abdominal
compartment syndrome, and mortality were collected from our database.
Individual charts were reviewed to determine the presence of extremity
fasciotomies and myonecrosis. These results were compared with
consecutive military casualties admitted during the 2-year- period
before the system-wide implementation of the BRG (control group).
RESULTS: One hundred eighteen military casualties with burns >30% TBSA
were admitted between January 2003 and June 2007, with n = 56 in the BRG
group and n = 62 in the control group. The groups were different in age,
but similar in %TBSA, %full thickness, presence of inhalation injury,
and injury severity score. There was no difference in the rate of
extremity fasciotomies or the incidence of myonecrosis between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The composite endpoint of abdominal compartment syndrome
and mortality was significantly lower in the BRG group compared with the
control group (p = 0.03). Implementation of the BRG and system-wide
standardization of burn resuscitation improved outcomes in severely
burned patients. Utilization of the joint theater trauma system to
implement system-wide guidelines is effective and can help improve
outcomes.
Fontana, I., M. Bertocchi, et al. (2008). "Renal transplant
compartment syndrome: a case report." Transplant Proc
40(6): 2065-6.
An unusual case of early double kidney transplant dysfunction due
to abdominal compartment syndrome is herein reported. A 62-year-old
woman on peritoneal dialysis underwent dual kidney transplantation. The
grafts were positioned extraperitoneally in both iliac possae using
standard techniques. Surgical procedures and immediate postoperative
period were uneventful. The urine output was immediate and the
creatinine decreased, but in a few days she developed severe ascites
with reduced urine output, increased creatinine, and progressive changes
on Doppler ultrasound. The patient underwent paracentesis: the kidney
function recovered as well as the Doppler ultrasound. Kidney biopsy was
negative for rejection or renal pathology. Graft dysfunction was related
to the presence of ascites. A catheter inserted in the abdomen measured
intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) of 14 mm Hg. IAP correlated with renal
function showing that IAP probably explained renal flow modifications.
Gelabert Payes, L. and D. Vicente Pastor (2008). "[How to
measure intra-abdominal pressure, the bladder pressure method]." Rev
Enferm 31(10): 34-8.
Abdominal pressure, abdominal hypertension and abdominal
compartment syndrome are not synonyms but well-differentiated entities
which have been studied over the last century in patients who have
medical or surgical problems and in those who have undergone
laparotomies to control abdominal damage. There are numerous
bibliographical references and studies which have been carried out in
this field by medical personnel to provide evidence of a tight
relationship among abdominal hypertension and secondary
physio-pathological alterations related to abdominal hypertension;
therefore, it is important to monitor patients which will help to
prevent abdominal compartment syndrome. The indirect intra-abdominal
pressure measurement technique based on bladder pressure measurement is
a useful procedure which nursing personnel administer and can even be
practiced in doctors' offices. This technique is easy, well-known in
surgical emergency wards and in reanimation wards; it is minimally
invasive, has few side effects and its results can benefit patients; at
present time, it is the preferred method to determine intra-abdominal
pressure. The authors describe this technique, the materials necessary
to administer it, and some of the aforementioned concepts to provide
knowledge about abdominal compartment syndrome. Prevention, diagnosis
and early measurement of bladder pressure and a timely decompression are
the keys to decrease the death rate in patients affected by this
syndrome.
Germanos, S., S. Gourgiotis, et al. (2008). "Damage control
surgery in the abdomen: an approach for the management of severe injured
patients." Int J Surg 6(3):
246-52.
Damage control is well established as a potentially life-saving
procedure in a few selected critically injured patients. In these
patients the 'lethal triad' of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy
is presented as a vicious cycle that often can not be interrupted and
which marks the limit of the patient's ability to cope with the
physiological consequences of injury. The principles of damage control
have led to improved survival and to stopped bleeding until the
physiologic derangement has been restored and the patient could undergo
a prolong operation for definitive repair. Although morbidity is
remaining high, it is acceptable if it comes in exchange for improved
survival. There are five critical decision-making stages of damage
control: I, patient selection and decision to perform damage control;
II, operation and intraoperative reassessment of laparotomy; III,
resuscitation in the intensive care unit; IV, definitive procedures
after returning to the operating room; and V, abdominal wall
reconstruction. The purpose of this article is to review the physiology
of the components of the 'lethal triad', the indication and principles
of abdominal damage control of trauma patients, the reoperation time,
and the pathophysiology of abdominal compartment syndrome.
Giuliani, A., L. Basso, et al. (2008). "Bilateral ovarian
mucinous cystadenoma in an adolescent presenting as abdominal
compartment syndrome." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
140(2): 278-9.
Grevious, M. A., R. Iqbal, et al. (2008). "Staged approach
for abdominal wound closure following combined liver and intestinal
transplantation from living donors in pediatric patients." Pediatr
Transplant.
Primary closure of the abdominal wall after combined liver and
intestine transplantation from a living donor into a pediatric patient
is usually not possible, because of the size of the donor organ, graft
edema, and preexisting scars or stomas of the abdominal wall. Closure
under tension may lead to abdominal compartment syndrome with vascular
compromise and necrosis of the transplanted organ. We describe our
experience of abdominal wound closure after liver and intestinal
transplant in the pediatric patient using a staged approach. From
February 2003 to June 2006, we managed five pediatric liver and
intestinal living donor transplant recipients. Because of the large
post-transplantation abdominal wall defect, a staged technique of
abdominal wound closure was utilized. Initially, an absorbable
Polygalactin mesh was sutured around the layer of the defect. As soon as
adequate granulation tissue was formed over the mesh a STSG was applied.
From the wound stand point all five patients were managed successfully
with staged wound closure after transplantation. Granulation tissue
filled and covered the mesh within 7.6 wk. A STSG was then used to cover
the defect. All infants recovered well and none had a significant wound
complication in the immediate post-operative period following STSG. At a
mean follow-up of 24 months only one patient developed an
entero-cutaneous fistula five months post-transplant. Staged abdominal
wall coverage with the use of Polygalactin mesh followed by STSG is a
simple and effective technique. A closed wound is achieved in a timely
fashion with protection of the viscera. Residual ventral hernia will
need to be managed in the future with one of several reconstructive
techniques.
Gruenewald, M., J. Renner, et al. (2008). "Reliability of
continuous cardiac output measurement during intra-abdominal
hypertension relies on repeated calibrations: an experimental animal
study." Crit Care 12(5):
R132.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Monitoring cardiac output (CO) may allow
early detection of haemodynamic instability aiming to reduce morbidity
and mortality in critically ill patients. Continuous cardiac output
(CCO) monitoring is recommended in septic or postoperative patients with
high incidences of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). The aim of the
present study was to compare the agreement between three CCO methods and
bolus thermodilution CO technique during acute IAH and volume loading.
METHODS: Ten pigs were anaesthetised and instrumented for haemodynamic
measurements. Cardiac output was obtained by (I) PulseCO - pulse wave
analysis (LIDCO monitor), (II) PCCO - pulse contour analysis (PiCCO
monitor), (III) CCOPAC - continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution and
compared to COTCP - bolus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution at
baseline (BL), after fluid loading (FL), at IAH and after an additional
FL at IAH. Whereas PulseCO was only calibrated at BL, PCCO was
calibrated at each experimental step. RESULTS: PulseCO and PCCO
underestimated CO as overall bias +/- SD was 1.0 +/- 1.5 l/min and 1.0
+/- 1.1 l/min compared to COTCP. A clinical accepted agreement between
all CCO methods and COTCP was observed only at BL. Whereas IAH did not
influence CO, increased CO following FL at IAH was only reflected by
CCOPAC and COTCP, not by uncalibrated PulseCO and PCCO. After
recalibration, PCCO was comparable with COTCP. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac
output obtained by uncalibrated PulseCO and PCCO failed to agree with
COTCP during intra-abdominal hypertension and fluid loading. In the
critically ill patient, recalibration of continuous arterial waveform CO
methods should be performed after fluid loading or before a major change
in therapy is initiated.
Gutarra, F., J. R. Asensio, et al. (2008). "Closure of a
contained open abdomen using a bipedicled myofascial oblique rectus
abdominis flap technique." J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
A contained open abdomen is commonly used during damage control
laparotomy and consists of the temporary coverage of the abdomen for
protection of the viscera and reduction of intra-abdominal pressure.
Definitive closure of a contained open abdomen is technically difficult
due to the inability to obtain primary fascial suture. The insertion of
a prosthetic mesh can be complicated with enterocutaneous fistula, and
other definitive closure techniques need several surgical procedures. We
describe a low cost technique that allows definitive closure of large
abdominal wall defects avoiding the risk of intestinal fistula.
Hakobyan, R. V. and G. G. Mkhoyan (2008). "Epidural analgesia
decreases intraabdominal pressure in postoperative patients with primary
intra-abdominal hypertension." Acta Clin Belg
63(2): 86-92.
INTRODUCTION: Surgical decompression is a lifesaving procedure in
patients with severe intraabdominal hypertension. However, it involves
subsequent management of an open abdomen. Therefore, it is not
recommended for moderate intra-abdominal hypertension. Our literature
search did not show any studies relating the efficacy of epidural
analgesia in decreasing elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP) in
critically-ill surgical patients with primary intra-abdominal
hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through a blinded prospective study,
we investigated postoperative critically-ill surgical and trauma
patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension, who received
postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia (n = 58) or intravenous opioid
analgesia (n = 130). Patients in the epidural group received ropivacaine
0.2% 10 ml, followed by an infusion of 5 ml/h for 96 hours. Patients in
the opioid group could receive morphine hydrochloride (0.1 mg/kg IV for
every 4-6 hours as needed) with or without ketorolac trometamol (up to
90 mg/day IV). IAP was measured transvesically, for every 6 hours.
Additionally, measurements immediately before and 1 hour after the
initiation of epidural analgesia were taken. Abdominal Perfusion
Pressure (APP) was calculated for each IAP measurement as APP = MAP -
IAP where MAP is the mean arterial pressure. RESULTS: In the epidural
group we found a consistent decrease in IAP from 16.82 +/- 4.56 to 6.30
+/- 3.11 mmHg and an increase in APP from 60.26 +/- 21.893 to 76.10 +/-
17.54 mmHg between baseline values until the second day of epidural
analgesia, which remained stable afterwards. There were no significant
differences of IAP and APP in the opioid group. CoNCLUSION: Continuous
thoracic epidural analgesia decreases IAP and improves APP without
haemodynamic compromise in postoperative critically-ill patients with
primary intra-abdominal hypertension.
Harrisson, S. E., J. E. Smith, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
compartment syndrome: an emergency department perspective." Emerg Med
J 25(3): 128-32.
Compartment syndromes can occur in many body regions. Abdominal
compartment syndrome, initially described many years ago, has become
increasingly recognised in critical care patients. The key points
regarding its definition, pathophysiology, aetiology and treatment are
described and discussed. Abdominal compartment syndrome is defined as an
intra-abdominal pressure >20 mm Hg with evidence of organ dysfunction.
At risk patients should be identified in the emergency department and
early monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure instituted. Interventions
in the emergency department potentially contribute to the development of
abdominal compartment syndrome during subsequent phases of care. The
need to ensure an early multidisciplinary approach in the management of
this complex condition is essential for the best possible patient
outcome.
Hedenstierna, G. and M. Lattuada (2008). "Lymphatics and
lymph in acute lung injury." Curr Opin Crit Care
14(1): 31-6.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lymph flow will be discussed as part of the
drainage and fluid balance of lung tissue and abdomen as well as a
qualitative analysis of inflammatory processes. RECENT FINDINGS:
Measurement of lung lymph is still a technical challenge. Mechanical
ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure impede lung lymph flow
by increased intrathoracic pressure and increased central venous
pressure. Positive end-expiratory pressure may thus enhance edema
formation of the lung. Inflammatory spread from abdomen to the lung via
the lymphatic system has been shown in a number of experimental studies.
Ligation or diversion of the thoracic duct has been proposed to blunt
the effects of noxious stimuli mediated by lymphatics to the lungs.
Lymphatics have a major role on abdominal fluid balance while draining
extravascular fluid accumulation and edema, especially during sepsis.
Mechanical ventilation with high airway pressure increases abdominal
edema (ascites) and spontaneous breathing protects from edema formation.
SUMMARY: Lymph flow measurements are still a difficult task to perform;
however, new results show an important function in the fluid balance of
the lung and abdomen. Inflammatory spread may occur from the lung to the
periphery by the blood stream and from the abdomen to the lung by lymph
flow.
Hongyan, L., E. L. Daugherty, et al. (2008). "Recognition and
importance of forced exhalation on the measurement of intraabdominal
pressure: a subgroup analysis from a prospective cohort study on the
incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome in medical patients." J
Intensive Care Med 23(4):
268-74.
Intraabdominal pressure is measured conventionally at
end-expiration; however, the significance of forced exhalation on this
measurement has not been evaluated previously. Using data from a
previous prospective cohort study of the incidence of intraabdominal
hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in medical intensive
care unit patients, the authors evaluated 65 strip-chart recordings
obtained from 28 patients who had measurements of intraabdominal
pressure and airway pressures taken simultaneously. Forced exhalation
was identified by a rise in intraabdominal pressure during exhalation.
Forced exhalation was observed in 4 patients; with a mean intraabdominal
pressure increase of 14.3 +/- 1.3 mm Hg at end-exhalation, compared with
a decrease of -2.5 +/- 1.2 mm Hg in 24 patients without forced
exhalation and absolute pressures of 28.0 +/- 6.6 versus 13.8 +/- 3.9 mm
Hg (P < .001). However, there was no difference in end-inspiratory
values. Forced exhalation is not uncommon in acutely ill, mechanically
ventilated medical intensive care unit patients and may increase
intraabdominal pressure significantly to values that exceed the
diagnostic threshold for abdominal compartment syndrome.
Hunter, J. D. (2008). "Abdominal compartment syndrome: an
under-diagnosed contributory factor to morbidity and mortality in the
critically ill." Postgrad Med J
84(992): 293-8.
As the abdomen is a closed cavity, it follows that any increase
in abdominal contents will inexorably lead to a rise in the
intra-abdominal pressure. Normally this is less than 7 mm Hg, but when
it persistently exceeds 12 mm Hg, renal, intestinal, pulmonary,
cardiovascular and central nervous system dysfunction arises. A wide
range of conditions encountered in both medical and surgical intensive
care units are associated with a rise in intra-abdominal pressure. When
this pressure is continually above 20 mm Hg, organ system failure can
occur, a condition known as abdominal compartment syndrome. Failure to
recognise and treat this syndrome is associated with a high morbidity
and mortality.
Jonsson, M., S. Linder, et al. (2008). "[Life-saving
decompression in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe acute
pancreatitis]." Lakartidningen
105(40): 2770-1.
Karakoulas, K., V. Grosomanidis, et al. (2008). "The effect
of intra-abdominal hypertension alone or combined intra-abdominal
hypertension-endotoxemia in cerebral oxygenation in a porcine model."
Hippokratia 12(4): 225-9.
Background: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has been
recognized as an entity, affecting cardiovascular, pulmonary, and
cerebral function, while it is often complicated with sepsis. Goal of
the study was the evaluation of brain oxygenation during ACS alone and
in combination with endotoxinemia.Materials and Methods: Sixteen pigs,
undergone intra-abdominal hypertension, were allocated to receive
intravenous administration of either saline or endotoxin. Pigs were
evaluated regarding brain tissue oxygenation (PbrO(2)), systemic
oxygenation (PaO(2)) and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF).Results:
Statistical analysis revealed significant reduction of PbrO(2) over time
for sepsis group, after endotoxin administration. Regarding differences
between groups, sepsis group experienced lower PbrO(2) values, compared
to saline group, only after endotoxin administration.. Both groups
experienced reduction in arterial oxygenation, with greater pertubations
seen after sepsis induction. Regarding rCBF, septic pigs showed greater
flow values, while ACS alone did not influence rCBF. ACS has no
deleterious effects in cerebral oxygenation and flow, provided systemic
oxygenation and CPP are maintained above normal value.Conclusions:
Combined sepsis-ACS lead to perturbations in cerebral oxygenation, in
conjunction with greater rCBF values. The latter could be ascribed to
abnormalities in oxygen extraction.
Keramati, M., A. Srivastava, et al. (2008). "The Wittmann
Patch s a temporary abdominal closure device after decompressive
celiotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome following burn." Burns
34(4): 493-7.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome is frequently the
result of aggressive fluid resuscitation after burn. Management of the
open abdomen following decompressive celiotomy is a major problem.
METHODS: From 2004 to mid-2005, six patients required decompressive
celiotomy after developing abdominal compartment syndrome as a result of
burn. A Wittmann Patch as used to close the abdominal wound. Patients
were re-explored when clinical parameters improved and the abdomen was
closed, with long-term follow-up for the abdominal wound. RESULTS: Of
the six patients, five had thermal injury and one had electrical injury.
The mean total body surface area affected for thermal burn was 78% and
for electrical burn was 37%. Diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome
was based on elevated bladder pressure and organ dysfunction. The
patients were treated with decompressive celiotomy and Wittmann Patch
closure. Survivors subsequently underwent primary abdominal closure,
with no evidence of ventral hernia at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION:
In burn cases with abdominal compartment syndrome, a Wittmann Patch ay
prove a helpful method of temporary abdominal closure, followed by
primary closure with no complications.
Khadaroo, R. G. and J. C. Marshall (2008). "Gastrointestinal
dysfunction in the critically ill: can we measure it?" Crit Care
12(5): 180.
ABSTRACT: Gastrointestinal dysfunction is an intuitively
important, yet descriptively elusive component of the multiple organ
dysfunction syndrome. Reintam and colleagues have attempted to quantify
this dimension using a combination of intolerance of enteral feeding,
and the development of intra-abdominal hypertension. While they show
that both parameters are associated with an increased risk of death (and
therefore that, in combination, the risk of death is even greater), they
fall short in developing a novel descriptor of gastrointestinal
dysfunction. Nonetheless, and even with its shortcomings, their effort
is a welcome contribution to the surprisingly complex process of
describing the morbidity of critical illness.
Kula, R., P. Szturz, et al. (2008). "Negative fluid balance
in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome--case reports." Acta
Chir Belg 108(3): 346-9.
Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as a sustained
increase of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) above 20 mmHg followed by the
development of organ dysfunction. Treatment of ACS is still a question
to be discussed and surgical decompression is usually preferred.
According to recent data, massive crystalloid resuscitation of shock
plays a key role in the development of secondary ACS in trauma patients.
As mentioned previously, a high volume of infused crystalloids and a
positive fluid balance were associated with ACS development in trauma
patients as well as in septic patients. Moreover, we observed that a
treatment strategy based on the achievement of a negative fluid balance
resulted in a dramatic decrease in IAP and an improvement in
haemodynamics and ventilation. This approach has been indicated as an
interesting option for non-surgical treatment, with a caution that such
intervention may exacerbate gut hypoperfusion. In this report we present
two patients with secondary ACS development following abdominal surgery
in which the achievement of a negative fluid balance showed a similar
effect. Moreover, the fluid removal procedure also seemed to be
associated with an improvement in splanchnic perfusion, as measured by
gastric tonometry.
Lam, M. C., P. T. Yang, et al. (2008). "Abdominal compartment
syndrome complicating paediatric extracorporeal life support: diagnostic
and therapeutic challenges." Anaesth Intensive Care
36(5): 726-31.
We report three paediatric cases, and summarise the reported
experience in two others, with cardiorespiratory failure requiring
extracorporeal life support for which supportive pump flows could not be
maintained due to abdominal compartment syndrome. In two of our
patients, the mechanism of abdominal compartment syndrome was massive
intra-abdominal fluid extravasation secondary to sepsis, while in the
third, the mechanism was post-traumatic intra-abdominal haemorrhage.
Although all three children eventually died, decompressive laparotomy
and arrest of haemorrhage in the trauma patient restored venous return
and enabled technically adequate extracorporeal life support. In two
previously reported cases of sepsis with massive fluid resuscitation
resulting in abdominal compartment syndrome, one patient died without
attempted decompression, while the other patient survived after
peritoneal catheter placement restored venous return. Once correctable
causes of inadequate venous cannula drainage have been excluded,
abdominal compartment syndrome should be considered in any patient on
extracorporeal life support with a taut abdomen and reduced venous
return. If abdominal compartment syndrome can be proven or is strongly
suspected, there may be a role for selective decompressive laparotomy.
Lerner, S. M. (2008). "Review article: the abdominal
compartment syndrome." Aliment Pharmacol Ther
28(4): 377-84.
BACKGROUND: The term abdominal compartment syndrome refers to
hypoperfusion and ischaemia of intra-abdominal viscera and structures
caused by raised intra-abdominal pressure. It occurs most commonly
following major trauma and complex surgical procedures, but can also
occur in their absence. Definitive treatment is decompression at
laparotomy. Prevention and recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome
are crucial to avoid additional morbidity and mortality. Postinjury
abdominal compartment syndrome continues to complicate current
resuscitation methods and new strategies for resuscitating critically
ill patients need to be explored in addition to more accurate monitoring
of intra-abdominal pressure. AIM: To examine the published literature
regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of the abdominal
compartment syndrome. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature
was undertaken. RESULTS: This syndrome is an important complication of
major trauma and surgery as well as being recognized in critically-ill
medical patients. It requires prompt recognition with a view to
decompression at laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The abdominal compartment
syndrome is an important complication of trauma, surgery and
resuscitation. Key to its management are its prompt recognition and
abdominal decompression.
Lingegowda, V., A. A. Ejaz, et al. (2008). "Normotensive
ischemic acute kidney injury as a manifestation of intra-abdominal
hypertension." Int Urol Nephrol.
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), leading to abdominal
compartment syndrome (ACS), is a frequent cause of acute kidney injury
(AKI) in surgical and trauma intensive care units not commonly
recognized by nephrologists. Multiple organ systems are often affected
and frequently culminate in disastrous outcomes. The diagnosis of AKI as
a manifestation of IAH requires a high index of clinical suspicion,
especially, because laboratory and imaging studies are unreliable. Early
recognition and treatment of the condition is associated with good
clinical outcome. We report a typical case of normotensive ischemic AKI
as a manifestation of IAH following abdominal surgery.
Liotier, J., M. Barbier, et al. (2008). "A rare cause of
abdominal compartment syndrome: acute trichlorethylene overdose."
Clin Toxicol (Phila) 46(9):
905-7.
INTRODUCTION: The clinical signs of acute trichlorethylene
overdose are commonly coma, cardiac conduction disturbances, diarrhea,
and vomiting. We report a case of intentional massive trichlorethylene
ingestion inducing a fatal abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). CASE
REPORT: A 47-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department
after intentionally ingesting 500 mL of trichlorethylene and
benzodiazepines. She rapidly developed coma and abdominal distension
leading to multiple organ failure. Subsequent surgical evaluation
revealed abdominal perforation and necrosis, and life-sustaining
treatments were therefore withdrawn. DISCUSSION: This is a primary ACS
that can be explained from experimental data on the pathophysiology of
pneumatosis cystoides coli. For this case, we discuss multiple
etiological factors for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAP), such as
paralytic ileus and massive fluid resuscitation due to the direct
toxicity of ingested trichlorethylene. CONCLUSION: Patients ingesting
trichlorethylene need to be closely evaluated for risk of digestive
damage and perforation. Early prompt laparotomy must be performed in
cases of ACS.
Liu, Y., D. F. Wang, et al. (2008). "[Monitoring of
intra-abdominal pressure in management of abdominal compartment syndrome
complicating severe acute pancreatitis.]." Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji
Jiu Yi Xue 20(9): 574.
Lo, E., L. Nicolle, et al. (2008). "Strategies to prevent
catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals."
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
29 Suppl 1: S41-50.
Lynn, J. J., Y. M. Weng, et al. (2008). "Perforated peptic
ulcer associated with abdominal compartment syndrome." Am J Emerg Med
26(9): 1071 e3-5.
Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as an increased
intra-abdominal pressure with adverse physiologic consequences.
Abdominal compartment syndrome caused by perforated peptic ulcer is rare
owing to early diagnosis and management. Delayed recognition of
perforated peptic ulcer with pneumoperitoneum, bowel distension, and
decreased abdominal wall compliance can make up a vicious circle and
lead to ACS. We report a case of perforated peptic ulcer associated with
ACS. A 74-year-old man with old stroke and dementia history was found to
have distended abdomen, edema of bilateral legs, and cyanosis.
Laboratory tests revealed deterioration of liver and kidney function.
Abdominal compartment syndrome was suspected, and image study was
arranged to find the cause. The study showed pneumoperitoneum, contrast
stasis in heart with decreased caliber of vessels below the abdominal
aortic level, and diffuse lymphedema at the abdominal walls. Emergent
laparotomy was performed. Perforated peptic ulcer was noted and the
gastrorrhaphy was done. The symptoms, and liver and kidney function
improved right after emergent operation.
Madigan, M. C., C. D. Kemp, et al. (2008). "Secondary
abdominal compartment syndrome after severe extremity injury: are early,
aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies to blame?" J Trauma
64(2): 280-5.
INTRODUCTION: Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is
the development of ACS in the absence of abdominal injury. The
development of secondary ACS has been viewed by some authors as an
unavoidable sequela of the aggressive crystalloid resuscitation often
employed in the treatment of severe shock. We hypothesized that poor
resuscitation techniques, including early and excessive crystalloid
administration, places patients with extremity injuries at risk for
developing secondary ACS. METHODS: The Trauma Registry of the American
College of Surgeons database was queried for all patients with an
extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 3 or greater and
abdominal AIS score of 0 treated at our institution between January 1,
2001 and December 31, 2005. The study group included those patients who
developed secondary ACS, whereas the comparison cohort included those
who did not develop secondary ACS. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients
developed secondary ACS and were compared with 48 randomly selected
patients who had an extremity AIS score of 3 or greater and an abdomen
AIS score of 0. There were no differences between the groups with
respect to age, sex, race, or individual AIS scores. However, the
secondary ACS group had a slightly higher Injury Severity Score (25.6
vs. 21.4, p = 0.02), significantly higher operating room crystalloid
administration (9.9 L vs. 2.7 L, p < 0.001), and more frequent use of a
rapid infuser (12.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.01). Multiple logistic regression
identified prehospital and emergency department crystalloid as
predictors of secondary ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive resuscitation
techniques, often begun in the prehospital setting, appear to increase
the likelihood of patients with severe extremity injuries developing
secondary ACS. Early, large volume crystalloid administration was the
greatest predictor of secondary ACS.
Maerz, L. and L. J. Kaplan (2008). "Abdominal compartment
syndrome." Crit Care Med 36(4 Suppl): S212-5.
Acute renal failure frequently occurs in the intensive care unit
as a primary or secondary event in association with trauma, surgery, or
comorbid medical disease. An increasingly common thread linking surgical
and medical disease management is the abdominal compartment syndrome. In
particular, the rise of early goal-directed therapy for the initial
resuscitation and management of severe sepsis and septic shock is
associated with an increased frequency of secondary abdominal
compartment syndrome. This paper will explore the pathophysiology
underpinning the abdominal compartment syndrome and its contribution to
acute kidney injury and acute renal failure with regard to
intra-abdominal pressure dynamics, preload limitation, and afterload
augmentation. Diagnostic modalities and therapeutic interventions will
be addressed as a means of reducing the frequency of acute kidney injury
and acute renal failure in the critically ill.
Mahajna, A., S. Mitkal, et al. (2008). "Postoperative gastric
dilatation causing abdominal compartment syndrome." World J Emerg
Surg 3: 7.
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of postoperative gastric
dilatation on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). DESIGN AND SETTING: Single
case report from a primary teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A
72-year-old woman demonstrated a sudden respiratory and cardiovascular
collapse following resection of a retroperitoneal sarcoma. This collapse
was caused by abdominal compartment syndrome due to gastric dilatation.
RESULTS: The patient was re-explored, an enormously distended stomach
was found with the nasogastric tube situated in a small sliding hernia
which prevented drainage of the distended stomach. Re-positioning of the
nasogastric tube, allowed the decompression of the stomach and the
patient's condition immediately improved. CONCLUSION: Acute abdominal
distention following major abdominal surgery may result from acute
gastric dilatation, leading to oliguria and increased airway pressures.
Untreated gastric dilatation can cause abdominal compartment syndrome.
Malbrain, M. L. and I. De Laet (2008). "Epidemiology on
intra-abdominal hypertension: an urgent call for multicenter trials."
Crit Care Med 36(6):
1972-4.
Malbrain, M. L. and I. De Laet (2008). "Functional
haemodynamics during intra-abdominal hypertension: what to use and what
not use." Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
52(4): 576-7.
Malbrain, M. L., I. De Laet, et al. (2008). "Non-invasive
treatment of intraabdominal hypertension: the search for the Holy Grail
continues." Acta Clin Belg
63(2): 63-6.
Malbrain, M. L., I. De Laet, et al. (2008). "Continuous
intra-abdominal pressure monitoring: this is the way to go!" Int J
Clin Pract 62(3): 359-62.
Malbrain, M. L., I. De laet, et al. (2008). "In vitro
validation of a novel method for continuous intra-abdominal pressure
monitoring." Intensive Care Med
34(4): 740-5.
OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement is
important in daily clinical practice. Most measurement techniques vary
in automaticity and reproducibility. This study tested a new fully
automated continuous technique for IAP measurement, the CiMON. METHODS:
Three IAP measurement catheters (a Foley manometer and two
balloon-tipped catheters) contained in a 50-ml infusion bag were placed
on the bottom of a half open 3-l container. To simulate IAH the
container was filled with water using 5 cmH2O increments (0-30 cmH2O).
Pressure was estimated by observers using the Foley manometer (IAP(FM))
and simultaneously recorded using two IAP monitors: IAP(spie) with
Spiegelberg and IAP(CiM) with CiMON. Observers were blinded to the
reference levels. Fifteen observers (three intensivists, four residents,
two medical students, and six nurses) conducted three pressure readings
at each of the seven pressure levels with the FM technique, giving 315
readings. These were paired with the automated IAP(spie) and IAP(CiM)
readings and the height of the H2O column. RESULTS: The intra- and
interobserver coefficients of variation (COVA) were low for all methods.
There was no difference in the results between specialists, physicians
in training, andnurses. Spearman's correlation coefficient (R2) values
for all paired measurements were greater than 0.9, and Bland-Altman
analysis comparing the reference H2O column, IAP(FM), and IAP(spie) to
IAP(CiM) showed a very good agreement at all pressure levels (bias
-0.1+/-0.6 cmH2O, 95%CI -0.2 to 0). There was a consistent, low
underestimation of the reference H2O pressure by the Spiegelberg
technique and a low overestimation at pressures below 20 cmH2O by both
other techniques. CONCLUSIONS: All three measurement techniques,
IAP(FM), IAP(spie), and IAP(CiM) have good agreement with the applied
hydrostatic pressure in this in vitro model of IAP measurement.
Malbrain, M. L., W. Vidts, et al. (2008). "Acute intestinal
distress syndrome: the importance of intra-abdominal pressure."
Minerva Anestesiol.
Malhotra, A. and D. Hillman (2008). "Obesity and the lung: 3.
Obesity, respiration and intensive care." Thorax
63(10): 925-31.
Obesity is a major problem from a public health perspective and a
difficult practical matter for intensivists. The obesity pandemic has
required treating clinicians to develop an appreciation of the
substantial pathophysiological effects of obesity on the various organ
systems. The important physiological concepts are illustrated by
focusing on obstructive sleep apnoea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome,
abdominal compartment syndrome and ventilatory management of the obese
patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Martinez-Lage, J. F., J. M. Martos-Tello, et al. (2008).
"Severe constipation: an under-appreciated cause of VP shunt
malfunction: a case-based update." Childs Nerv Syst
24(4): 431-5.
BACKGROUND: Increased intra-abdominal pressure has been reported
to result in raised intracranial pressure in a variety of conditions
such as obesity and pregnancy, and it also constitutes an infrequent
cause of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt malfunction. Patients with
neurological deficits, as those with myelomeningocele or cerebral palsy,
are prone to developing a neurogenic bowel and to suffer chronic
constipation. Although previously recognized, VP shunt failure
attributed to constipation has only recently been described. We briefly
review the etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and management of severe
constipation leading to VP shunt malfunction. Our aim is to draw the
attention of pediatric neurosurgeons towards severe constipation as a
possible cause of VP shunt failure thus avoiding unnecessary surgical
valve revisions, to which children with hydrocephalus are often
submitted to. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES: We report two children that developed
transient VP shunt failure because of intense constipation that caused
exacerbation of previously shunted hydrocephalus. One of the patients
constitutes the first description of this complication associated with
an anteriorly placed anus and the other with intestinal paresis after
ileostomy. Conservative treatment aimed at alleviating the increased
intra-abdominal pressure resulted in complete resolution of the
children's manifestations of VP shunt failure, without having to resort
to surgical revision of the VP shunt.
McBeth, P. B., I. Zengerink, et al. (2008). "Comparison of
intermittent and continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring using an
in vitro model." Int J Clin Pract
62(3): 400-5.
INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is increasingly
being considered as an important physiologic parameter to be measured in
critically ill patients. Traditional methods of monitoring IAP rely on
intermittent IAP (IIAP) measurements using indwelling bladder catheters.
Recently, a method of continuous IAP (CIAP) monitoring has been
developed using a three-way bladder catheter. This study evaluates the
reliability of IIAP and CIAP measurement techniques using an in vitro
model. METHODS: An in vitro model of the abdomen was constructed using a
50 l container with a 100 ml infusion bag at the base to simulate a
bladder. A three-way catheter tip was centered within the infusion bag
filled with 50 ml saline. To simulate IAP the container was filled with
water at 5 cm H(2)O increments from 10 to 25 cm H(2)O. Pressures were
recorded by observers from a bedside monitor interfaced with a three-way
Foley catheter using alternating intermittent and continuous techniques.
Each subject was blinded to the known pressure values. Descriptive
statistics and a generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to
describe the relationship of IIAP and CIAP to known pressures. RESULTS:
One hundred and thirty-two (132) observations were made by 20 subjects
for both IIAP and CIAP estimates. In 45.5% of IIAP measures, the
estimate was correct, and it was never more than 1 cm H(2)O different
from the actual. Similarly, in 38.6% of CIAP measures, the estimate was
correct, and was never more than 2 cm H(2)O from the actual. The GEE
regression coefficients comparing known pressures with IIAP and CIAP
were 1.007 and 0.976 respectively. The minimum and maximum pressure
deviations never exceeded more than 1.3 cm H(2)O from the actual.
CONCLUSION: Intermittent IAP and CIAP are both reliable and reproducible
methods to measure IAP in an in vitro model. There exists a direct and
significant association between both measurements and the actual value.
Neither measure was shown to be superior.
Mogilner, J. G., H. Bitterman, et al. (2008). "Effect of
elevated intra-abdominal pressure and hyperoxia on portal vein blood
flow, hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis in a rat model." Eur J
Pediatr Surg 18(6):
380-6.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Indications for a laparoscopic approach for
the management of biliary atresia in children are not clearly defined.
We have recently shown that persistent intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
significantly decreased portal vein (PV) flow. Ventilation with a high
concentration of oxygen after abdomen deflation raises concerns of
increased oxidative stress but has also been shown to exert beneficial
effects on splanchnic ischemia/reperfusion. The purpose of the present
study was to evaluate the effects of IAP and hyperoxia on liver
histology, hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis in a rat model of
abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats
were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine and xylasine. After a
midline laparotomy, the PV was isolated. Ultrasonic blood flow probes
were placed on the vessel for continuous measurement of regional blood
flow. Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was continuously measured. Two
large-caliber percutaneous peripheral intravenous catheters were
introduced into the peritoneal cavity for inflation of air and
measurement of IAP. Rats were divided into three experimental groups: 1)
Sham rats were subjected to IAP of 0 mmHg; 2) ACS rats were subjected to
IAP of 6 mmHg for 2 hours and were ventilated with air; and 3) ACS-O (2)
rats were subjected to IAP of 6 mmHg for 2 hours and were ventilated
with 100 % O (2) during the operation and ventilation was continued for
6 hours after operation. Liver structural changes, hepatocyte
proliferation (using BrdU assay) and apoptosis (using Tunel assay) were
determined 24 hours following operation. RESULTS: IAP at 6 mmHg caused a
twofold decrease in PV flow compared to sham animals. Hyperoxia resulted
in a less significant decrease in PV flow compared to air-ventilated
animals. Despite a significant decrease in PV blood flow, 24 hours after
abdominal deflation only a few animals demonstrated histological signs
of liver damage. The small histological changes were accompanied by
increased hepatocyte apoptosis and enhanced hepatocyte proliferation in
25 % of animals, suggesting a liver repair response. CONCLUSIONS:
Despite a significant decrease in PV blood flow, persistent IAP for 2
hours results in few changes in liver histology, and stimulates
hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis in only a few animals, supporting
the presence of a recovering mechanism. Treatment with hyperoxia did not
significantly change hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis.
Mullens, W., Z. Abrahams, et al. (2008). "Prompt reduction in
intra-abdominal pressure following large-volume mechanical fluid removal
improves renal insufficiency in refractory decompensated heart failure."
J Card Fail 14(6):
508-14.
BACKGROUND: Our group recently reported that elevated
intra-abdominal pressure (IAP, defined as > or = 8 mm Hg) can be
associated with renal dysfunction in patients with advanced
decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We hypothesize that in the setting
of persistently elevated IAP and progressive renal insufficiency
refractory to intensive medical therapy, mechanical fluid removal can be
associated with improvements in IAP and renal function. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The renal and hemodynamic profiles of 9 consecutive,
volume-overloaded subjects with ADHF and elevated IAP, refractory to
intensive medical therapy, were prospectively collected. All subjects
experienced progressive elevation of serum creatinine and IAP in
response to intravenous loop diuretics. Within 12 hours after mechanical
fluid removal via paracentesis (n = 5, mean volume removed 3187 +/- 1772
mL) or ultrafiltration (n = 4, mean volume removed 1800 +/- 690 mL),
there was a significant reduction in IAP (from 13 +/- 4 mm Hg to 7 +/- 2
mm Hg, P = .001), with corresponding improvement in renal function
(serum creatinine from 3.4 +/- 1.4 mg/dL to 2.4 +/- 1.1 mg/dL, P = .01)
without significantly altering any hemodynamic measurement. CONCLUSION:
In volume-overloaded patients admitted with ADHF refractory to intensive
medical therapy, we observed a reduction of otherwise persistently
elevated IAP with corresponding improvement in renal function after
mechanical fluid removal.
Mullens, W., Z. Abrahams, et al. (2008). "Elevated
intra-abdominal pressure in acute decompensated heart failure: a
potential contributor to worsening renal function?" J Am Coll Cardiol
51(3): 300-6.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether changes in
intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) with aggressive diuretic or vasodilator
therapy are associated with improvement in renal function in acute
decompensated heart failure (ADHF). BACKGROUND: Elevated IAP (>or=8 mm
Hg) is associated with intra-abdominal organ dysfunction. There is
potential for ascites and visceral edema causing elevated IAP in
patients with ADHF. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients admitted to a
specialized heart failure intensive care unit for management of ADHF
with intensive medical therapy were studied. The IAP was measured using
a simple transvesical technique at time of admission and before removal
of the pulmonary artery catheter. RESULTS: In our study cohort (mean age
59 +/- 13 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 19 +/- 9%,
baseline serum creatinine 2.0 +/- 0.9 mg/dl), the mean baseline IAP was
8 +/- 4 mm Hg, with 24 (60%) patients having elevated IAP. Elevated IAP
was associated with worse renal function (p = 0.009). Intensive medical
therapy resulted in improvement in both hemodynamic measurements and
IAP. A strong correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) was observed between
reduction in IAP and improved renal function in patients with baseline
elevated IAP. However, changes in IAP or renal function did not
correlate with changes in any hemodynamic variable. CONCLUSIONS:
Elevated IAP is prevalent in patients with ADHF and is associated with
impaired renal function. In the setting of intensive medical therapy for
ADHF, changes in IAP were better correlated with changes in renal
function than any hemodynamic variable.
Mysliwiec, P. and B. Kedra (2008). "[Abdominal compartment
syndrome--current recommendations]." Przegl Lek
65(9): 401-4.
Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) occurs in critically ill
patients for surgical, as well as medical reasons. It implies
significant mortality. Therefore diagnostic vigilance and agressive
treatment are necessary. All patients at elevated risk of ACS should
have their intraabdominal pressure monitored, which is best measured in
the urinary bladder. The currently adopted borderline of intra-abdominal
hypertension is 12 mmHg and of ACS -20 mmHg, if it is accompanied by
abdominal or thoracic organ insufficiency. The gold standard of quick
and definitive treatment of ACS is surgical decompression by opening the
abdomen and leaving it open until intraabdominal pressure decreases.
Dressings with aspiration of abdominal fluid seem the most helpful,
although prospective studies are necessary. The methods of non-operation
decompression are a good alternative, when intraabdominal pressure is
lower and in oncological patients.
Otto, J., D. Kaemmer, et al. (2008). "Clinical evaluation of
an air-capsule technique for the direct measurement of intra-abdominal
pressure after elective abdominal surgery." BMC Surg
8: 18.
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for assessment of intraabdominal
pressure (IAP) is via intravesicular pressure measurement (IVP). This
accepted technique has some inherent problems, e.g. indirectness. Aim of
this clinical study was to assess direct IAP measurement using an
air-capsule method (ACM) regarding complications risks and agreement
with IVP in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: A
prospective cohort study was performed in 30 patients undergoing
elective colonic, hepatic, pancreatic and esophageal resection. For ACM
a Probe 3 (Spiegelberg, Germany) was placed on the greater omentum. It
was passed through the abdominal wall paralleling routine drainages. To
compare ACM with IVP t-testing was performed and mean difference as well
as limits of agreement were calculated. RESULTS: ACM did not lead to
complications particularly with regard to organ lesion or surgical site
infection. Mean insertion time of ACM was 4.4 days (min-max: 1-5 days).
168 pairwise measurements were made. Mean ACM value was 7.9 +/- 2.7 mmHg
while mean IVP was 8.4 +/- 3.0 mmHg (n.s). Mean difference was 0.4 mmHg
+/- 2.2 mmHg. Limits of agreement were -4.1 mmHg to 5.1 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: Using ACM, direct IAP measurement is feasible and
uncomplicated. Associated with relatively low pressure ranges (<17
mmHg), results are comparable to bladder pressure measurement.
Panagiotis, H., D. Panagiotis, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
compartment syndrome post-late Bochdalek hernia repair: A case report."
Cases J 1(1): 199.
ABSTRACT: The aim of this case report is to discuss the rare
postoperative complication of abdominal compartment syndrome in a
19-year-old Caucasian Greek male that was electively operated on for a
congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The hernia was completely asymptomatic
and was found in chest radiography for employment reasons. Abdominal
compartment syndrome is related in most reports with trauma and
abdominal operations. Timely diagnosis is key to the prevention of
further organ damage and multisystem organ dysfunction because the
syndrome once instituted is highly fatal.
Parsak, C. K., T. O. Acarturk, et al. (2008). "The
Relationship Between Increased Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Morbid
Obesity." World J Surg.
Parsak, C. K., G. Seydaoglu, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
compartment syndrome: current problems and new strategies." World J
Surg 32(1): 13-9.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a difficult
entity with two main problems during its course: (1) survival of the
patient during the early period and (2) closure of the open wounds
during the late period. In this study we evaluated the decision to
decompress according to the level of intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and
analysis of any recurrent or persistent increase in IAP. METHODS: A
prospective study was undertaken on 119 patients with increased IAP. The
IAP was measured daily by obtaining the bladder pressure. Patients were
monitored via a central venous line; and vital signs, arterial blood
gases, the Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation II
(APACHE II) score, and abbreviated mental tests were recorded. The
suggestions of Meldrum et al. were taken as a guideline during the
treatment. The sensitivity and specifity of IAP and APACHE II scores for
different cutoff values were calculated using the receiver operating
characteristic curve. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 33.6%, which
increased with co-morbidities (p = 0.03). A cutoff value for IAP of 23
mmHg was considered an optimal point predicting mortality. The IAP
within the first 3 days for patients who died was higher than the cutoff
value. For patients with IAP of 15 to 25 mmHg, nonsurgical therapy
increased the rate of mortality (odds ratio 5.2, 95% confidence interval
1.0-27.7; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS emergency, it is
recommended that decompressive laparotomy to be performed even if the
IAP falls below 25 mmHg. For patients with IAP levels higher than 25
mmHg, the IAP should be meticulously brought below the cutoff level
during the postoperative period.
Peng, Z. Y., L. A. Critchley, et al. (2008). "Effects of
norepinephrine during intra-abdominal hypertension on renal blood flow
in bacteremic dogs." Crit Care Med
36(3): 834-41.
OBJECTIVE: Intraabdominal hypertension reduces organ blood flow.
Restoring abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) may restore renal blood
flow, especially when sepsis is present. The effects of intra-abdominal
pressure (IAP), followed by restoration of APP with norepinephrine, on
renal blood flow were determined. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with
bacteremia after nonbacteremic (control) conditions. SETTING: University
animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Ten anesthetized mongrel dogs.
INTERVENTIONS: IAP was raised to 10, 20, and 30 mm Hg, using
intra-abdominal bags filled with saline. After each intervention,
decompression was achieved by emptying the bag. Bacteremia was induced
by injection of Escherichia coli. Cardiac output and renal blood flow
were measured using surgically placed flow probes. Norepinephrine
infusion was used to restore the mean arterial pressure to baseline at
each IAP. A hypervolemic circulation was maintained throughout by
infusing saline. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Induction of bacteremia
resulted in significant decreases in blood pressure, cardiac output, and
renal blood flow (p < .01). Serial increases in IAP decreased cardiac
output and renal blood flow both in control and bacteremic dogs (p <
.001). These decreases were substantially corrected by abdominal
decompression. In nonbacteremic control conditions, restoring APP back
to baseline with norepinephrine did not fully restore cardiac output and
renal blood flow (p < .001). However, in bacteremic conditions,
norepinephrine was able to substantially restore cardiac output and
renal blood flow to bacteremic baseline at all levels of IAP. In
bacteremic conditions, the renal perfusion fraction returned to
bacteremic baseline levels after correction of APP with norepinephrine
and after decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of APP using
norepinephrine improves renal blood flow in bacteremic animals with IAPs
up to 30 mm Hg, and maintaining a therapeutic APP may preserve renal
blood flow in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension who are at risk
of IAP-induced renal injury but who have yet to meet accepted criteria
for surgical decompression.
Peparini, N., F. M. Di Matteo, et al. (2008). "Abdominal
hypertension in Meigs' syndrome." Eur J Surg Oncol
34(8): 938-42.
AIMS: Two cases of chronic abdominal hypertension in
pseudo-Meigs' syndrome, one sustained by a large ovarian bilateral
carcinoma and the other by a giant genital angiomyolipoma, are reported.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Both patients presented to the emergency room for
abdominal distention and pain with progressive respiratory dysfunction,
hypotension over several days, and early symptoms of renal failure,
together suggestive of chronic, intra-abdominal hypertension.
DISCUSSION: Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment
syndrome are serious conditions which may complicate large tumors and
tense ascites, apart from their benign or malignant nature. The chronic
development of abdominal hypertension and onset of the abdominal
compartment syndrome associated with Meigs' syndrome must be recognized
in a timely manner and promptly treated by performing as complete a
resection of the pelvic mass as possible; alternatively, in acute
abdominal hypertension the monitoring of bladder pressure can evaluate
the effectiveness of medical therapy and determine the optimal timing of
decompressive laparotomy in case of the abdominal compartment syndrome.
Pupelis, G., K. Zeiza, et al. (2008). "Conservative approach
in the management of severe acute pancreatitis: eight-year experience in
a single institution." HPB (Oxford)
10(5): 347-55.
Introduction. Recognition of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP),
intensive care, shifting away from early surgical treatment, and
monitoring of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is important in the
management of SAP. The aim of our study was retrospective evaluation and
critical assessment of the experience with SAP management protocol
involving new strategy in the university hospital. Methods. Protocols of
274 SAP patients treated in our institution during the last eight years
were reassessed. APACHE II, CRP and SOFA score, IAP, pulmonary
complications, ventilatory support and infection rate were evaluated.
The success of the conservative treatment, surgical interventions and
mortality was analysed comparing period 1 from 1999 to 2002 and period 2
from 2003 to 2006. Results. More patients with necrotising SAP were
treated in period 2. The average CRP and SOFA score was higher in period
2, p=0.018; p=0.011. A total of 139 patients underwent continuous
veno-venouse haemofiltration (CVVH) as a component of fluid
resuscitation and IAP control. Application of CVVH increased in period
2, p<0.005. Only 5-8% of patients were managed with ventilatory support.
The overall infection rate decreased in period 2 comprising 21%,
p<0.005. Success rate of the conservative therapy reached 69% in period
2, p<0.01. Surgical treatment was performed in 41% of patients in period
1 vs. 19% in period 2, p<0.001. Overall mortality was 19%, with a
reduction to 12% in year 2006. Conclusion. The conservative
protocol-based approach is a rational treatment strategy for the
management of SAP and can be successfully implemented in the setting of
the university hospital.
Qvarfordt, P., M. Bjorck, et al. (2008). "[Acute compartment
syndromes in the abdomen and extremities. Big clinical problem which is
frequently missed]." Lakartidningen
105(40): 2765-8.
Rasner, J. N., K. Parrott, et al. (2008). "Management of
abdominal compartment syndrome in a very low birth weight neonate using
penrose drains and subsequent management of abdominal-wall defects."
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
18(4): 657-60.
Abstract Percutaneous drainage of the peritoneal cavity has been
recently evaluated for the treatment of perforated viscous in the very
low birth weight (VLBW) neonate and percutaneous decompression for
abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has been studied in older patient
populations. This is the first reported case of using this technique to
treat ACS in a VLBW neonate.
Regueira, T., A. Bruhn, et al. (2008). "Intra-abdominal
hypertension: incidence and association with organ dysfunction during
early septic shock." J Crit Care
23(4): 461-7.
PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to study the cumulative
incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in septic shock (SS)
patients during the first 72 hours of intensive care unit (ICU)
admission and to determine if the presence and severity of IAH are
associated with sepsis morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Eighty-one consecutive SS patients admitted to a surgical-medical ICU of
an academic university hospital (January 2005 to January 2006) were
included. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and abdominal perfusion
pressure (APP) were measured every 6 h (intermittently) for 72 h.
Intra-abdominal pressure was registered as minimal, mean, and maximal
values per day, during shock and throughout the study period.
Intra-abdominal hypertension was diagnosed if IAP remained 12 mm Hg or
higher on 2 consecutive measurements and stratified according to the
most recent consensus definition (www.wsacs.org). RESULTS: According to
maximal and mean IAP values, 67 (82.7%) and 62 (76.5%) of the patients
developed IAH during the study period, respectively. Mean IAP values
remained stable throughout the study period. Surgical patients had a
higher incidence of IAH than medical patients (93% vs 73%, P < .009).
Maximal IAPs were normally distributed, with nonsurvivors exhibiting
significantly higher IAP levels during shock (survivors, 17.2 +/- 5.3;
nonsurvivors, 19.9 +/- 5.6 mm Hg; P < .04). Patients with IAH exhibited
significantly lower values of APP and diuresis, higher values of lactate
and creatinine, and higher maximal norepinephrine doses, and were more
frequently mechanically ventilated (P < .05 for all). Increasing degrees
of IAH and the development of the abdominal compartment syndrome were
associated with lower APP and higher maximal serum creatinine levels (P
< .03 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Septic shock patients have a very high
incidence of IAH, which seems to be associated with the severity of
shock and could be related to the development of organ dysfunctions,
particularly renal dysfunction. Intra-abdominal pressure should be
routinely monitored during the course of SS.
Reintam, A., P. Parm, et al. (2008). "Primary and secondary
intra-abdominal hypertension--different impact on ICU outcome."
Intensive Care Med 34(9):
1624-31.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in incidence, time
course and outcome of primary versus secondary intra-abdominal
hypertension (IAH), and to evaluate IAH as an independent risk factor of
mortality in a presumable risk population of critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: General intensive care
unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 257 mechanically
ventilated patients at presumable risk for the development of IAH were
studied during their ICU stay and followed up for 90-day survival.
INTERVENTIONS: Repeated measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: IAP was measured intermittently, via bladder.
IAH (sustained or repeated IAP > or = 12 mmHg) developed in 95 patients
(37.0%). Primary IAH was observed in 60 and secondary IAH in 35
patients. Patients with secondary IAH demonstrated a significant
increase of mean IAP during the first three days (mean DeltaIAP was 2.2
+/- 4.7 mmHg), whilst IAP decreased (mean DeltaIAP -1.1 +/- 3.7 mmHg) in
the patients with primary IAH. The patients with IAH had a significantly
higher ICU- (37.9 vs. 19.1%; P = 0.001), 28-day (48.4 vs. 27.8%, P =
0.001), and 90-day mortality (53.7 vs. 35.8%, P = 0.004) compared to the
patients without the syndrome. Patients with secondary IAH had a
significantly higher ICU mortality than patients with primary IAH (P =
0.032). Development of IAH was identified as an independent risk factor
for death (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.23-5.14). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary IAH is
less frequent, has a different time course and worse outcome than
primary IAH. Development of IAH during ICU period is an independent risk
factor for death.
Reintam, A., P. Parm, et al. (2008). "Primary and secondary
intra-abdominal hypertension-different impact on ICU outcome."
Intensive Care Med 34(9):
1624-31.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in incidence, time
course and outcome of primary versus secondary intra-abdominal
hypertension (IAH), and to evaluate IAH as an independent risk factor of
mortality in a presumable risk population of critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: General intensive care
unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 257 mechanically
ventilated patients at presumable risk for the development of IAH were
studied during their ICU stay and followed up for 90-day survival.
INTERVENTIONS: Repeated measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: IAP was measured intermittently, via bladder.
IAH (sustained or repeated IAP >/= 12 mmHg) developed in 95 patients
(37.0%). Primary IAH was observed in 60 and secondary IAH in 35
patients. Patients with secondary IAH demonstrated a significant
increase of mean IAP during the first three days (mean DeltaIAP was 2.2
+/- 4.7 mmHg), whilst IAP decreased (mean DeltaIAP -1.1 +/- 3.7 mmHg) in
the patients with primary IAH. The patients with IAH had a significantly
higher ICU- (37.9 vs. 19.1%; P = 0.001), 28-day (48.4 vs. 27.8%, P =
0.001), and 90-day mortality (53.7 vs. 35.8%, P = 0.004) compared to the
patients without the syndrome. Patients with secondary IAH had a
significantly higher ICU mortality than patients with primary IAH (P =
0.032). Development of IAH was identified as an independent risk factor
for death (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.23-5.14). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary IAH is
less frequent, has a different time course and worse outcome than
primary IAH. Development of IAH during ICU period is an independent risk
factor for death.
Reintam, A., P. Parm, et al. (2008). "Gastrointestinal
Failure score in critically ill patients: a prospective observational
study." Crit Care 12(4):
R90.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: There are no universally accepted
diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal failure in critically ill
patients. In the present study we tested whether the occurrence of food
intolerance (FI) and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), combined in a
5-grade scoring system for assessment of gastrointestinal function (the
Gastrointestinal Failure [GIF] score), predicts mortality. The
prognostic value of the GIF score alone and in combination with the
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is evaluated, and the
incidence and outcome of gastrointestinal failure is described relative
to the GIF score. METHODS: A total of 264 subsequently hospitalized
patients, who were mechanically ventilated on admission and stayed in
the intensive care unit (ICU) for longer than 24 hours, were
prospectively studied. GIF score was documented daily as follows: 0 =
normal gastrointestinal function; 1 = enteral feeding with under 50% of
calculated needs or no feeding 3 days after abdominal surgery; 2 = FI or
IAH; 3 = FI and IAH; and 4 = abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).
Admission parameters and mean GIF and SOFA scores for the first 3 days
were used to predict ICU outcome. RESULTS: FI developed in 58.3%, IAH in
27.3%, and both together in 22.7% of patients. The mean GIF score for
the first 3 days in the ICU was identified as an independent risk factor
for mortality (odds ratio = 3.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.63 to
5.59; P < 0.001). The GIF score integrated into the SOFA score allowed
better prediction of ICU mortality than did the SOFA score alone, and
was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio = 1.49, 95%
confidence interval = 1.28 to 1.74; P < 0.001). The development of
gastrointestinal failure (FI plus IAH) was associated with significantly
higher ICU and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The GIF score is useful for
classifying information on the gastrointestinal system. The mean GIF
score during the first 3 days in the ICU had high prognostic value for
ICU mortality. Development of gastrointestinal failure is associated
with significantly impaired outcome.
Saint, S., C. P. Kowalski, et al. (2008). "Preventing
hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in the United States: a
national study." Clin Infect Dis
46(2): 243-50.
BACKGROUND: Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most
common hospital-acquired infection in the United States, to our
knowledge, no national data exist describing what hospitals in the
United States are doing to prevent this patient safety problem. We
conducted a national study to examine the current practices used by
hospitals to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. METHODS: We mailed written
surveys to infection control coordinators at a national random sample of
nonfederal US hospitals with an intensive care unit and >or=50 hospital
beds (n=600) and to all Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals (n=119). The
survey asked about practices to prevent hospital-acquired UTI and other
device-associated infections. RESULTS: The response rate was 72%.
Overall, 56% of hospitals did not have a system for monitoring which
patients had urinary catheters placed, and 74% did not monitor catheter
duration. Thirty percent of hospitals reported regularly using
antimicrobial urinary catheters and portable bladder scanners; 14% used
condom catheters, and 9% used catheter reminders. VA hospitals were more
likely than non-VA hospitals to use portable bladder scanners (49% vs.
29%; P=.001), condom catheters (46% vs. 12%; P=.001), and suprapubic
catheters (22% vs. 9%; P=.001); non-VA hospitals were more likely to use
antimicrobial urinary catheters (30% vs. 14%; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS:
Despite the strong link between urinary catheters and subsequent UTI, we
found no strategy that appeared to be widely used to prevent
hospital-acquired UTI. The most commonly used practices--bladder
ultrasound and antimicrobial catheters--were each used in fewer than
one-third of hospitals, and urinary catheter reminders, which have
proven benefits, were used in <10% of US hospitals.
Serpytis, M. and J. Ivaskevicius (2008). "The influence of
fluid balance on intra-abdominal pressure after major abdominal
surgery." Medicina (Kaunas)
44(6): 421-7.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the
incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension in patients after major
abdominal surgery and to evaluate the correlation of intra-abdominal
pressure with fluid balance and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study.
Patients, admitted to intensive care unit after major abdominal surgery,
were included into the study. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured via
a urinary bladder catheter twice daily. Twenty-four-hour fluid balance
and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria met by the patients
were collected daily. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were included into
the study. Intra-abdominal hypertension was diagnosed in about 40% of
the patients in the early postoperative period. The study showed a
significant positive correlation between 24-hour fluid balance and daily
changes in intra-abdominal pressure. A significant association was also
seen between the number of positive systemic inflammatory response
syndrome criteria and intra-abdominal pressure, and intra-abdominal
pressure was significantly higher in patients with systemic inflammatory
response syndrome. Besides, patients with intra-abdominal hypertension
on the first postoperative day had longer length of stay in the
intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension occurs
commonly in patients after major abdominal surgery, and patients with
positive 24-hour fluid balance and/or systemic inflammatory response
syndrome are at risk of having higher intra-abdominal hypertension.
Shaikh, N., M. A. Kettern, et al. (2008). "A rare and
unsuspected complication of Clostridium difficile infection."
Intensive Care Med 34(5):
963-6.
OBJECTIVE: To report the occurrence of abdominal compartment
syndrome (ACS) due to infection with Clostridium difficile. DESIGN: Case
report. SETTING: Trauma intensive care unit (TICU) of Hamad General
Hospital, a teaching hospital in Doha, Qatar. PATIENT: A 36-year-old man
involved in a motor vehicle accident had severe traumatic brain injury
and received ceftriaxone. On day 7, he developed severe abdominal
distension and diarrhoea followed by paralytic ileus with oliguria,
hyperkalaemia, and intra-abdominal hypertension. The patient's stool
sample was positive for C. difficile toxin A and B MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: An ACS was diagnosed. The patient was successfully treated in
the TICU by stopping the offending antibiotic and starting metronidazole
plus neostigmine as a prokinetic agent. The fluid status was guided by
pulse-induced continuous cardiac output, and frusemide was added to the
treatment. With this aggressive management the abdominal pressure
decreased and the renal function improved, with full recovery of renal
function by day 21. Unfortunately the patient's Glasgow coma score (GCS)
deteriorated, so percutaneous tracheostomy was performed. He was
transferred to the neurosurgical ward on day 35. A week later he was
shifted to the rehabilitation unit for further management. CONCLUSIONS:
C. difficile colitis can cause intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and
ACS. Rapid diagnosis, early aggressive supportive care, metronidazole
and prokinetics are necessary to lower the morbidity and mortality of C.
difficile colitis associated with IAH and ACS.
Siebig, S., I. Iesalnieks, et al. (2008). "Recovery from
respiratory failure after decompression laparotomy for severe acute
pancreatitis." World J Gastroenterol
14(35): 5467-70.
We present three cases of patients (at the age of 56 years, 49
years and 74 years respectively) with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP),
complicated by intra-abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and
respiratory insufficiency with limitations of mechanical ventilation.
The respiratory situation of the patients was significantly improved
after decompression laparotomy (DL) and lung protective ventilation was
re-achieved. ACS was discussed followed by a short review of the
literature. Our cases show that DL may help patients with SAP to recover
from severe respiratory failure.
Singh, M. K., J. P. Rocca, et al. (2008). "Open abdomen
management with human acellular dermal matrix in liver transplant
recipients." Transplant Proc
40(10): 3541-4.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall closure after liver transplantation is
not always feasible and may result in increased intra-abdominal pressure
along with associated complications. Various temporary closure
techniques as well as open wound management have been used to address
this complex problem. The aim of this series was to describe an approach
to definitive wound closure of the open abdomen in liver transplant
patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all liver
transplant patients at our institution from September 2005 to November
2007. The management of the open abdomen in 10 liver transplant patients
was reviewed, and a novel approach described to manage these defects.
RESULTS: Ten patients with open wounds were closed during the study
period using human acellular dermal matrix (HADM). There were 7 men and
3 women of median age 55 years. Average size of HADM was 235 cm(2). The
median follow-up is 10 months with no incidence of evisceration or
hernia. In 1 patient, the graft failed along the lateral side due to
infection; it dislodged during vacuum-assisted closure dressing change
in another patient at 5 months after closure. Fascial closure was not
possible due to organ edema (n = 3), a large liver (n = 4) or wound
infection with dehiscence (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: HADM can be used for
primary wound closure in both clean and contaminated wounds as an
alternative to an open abdomen post-liver transplantation.
Soltsman, S., P. Russo, et al. (2008). "Abdominal compartment
syndrome after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy." J
Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(4): 508-10.
Abdominal compartment syndrome is a consequence of increased
intraabdominal pressure. It can be triggered by inflammation,
hemorrhage, chemical peritonitis, or prolonged insufflations during
laparoscopy. It is a well-known phenomenon for intensive care
specialists, but gynecologists are relatively unfamiliar with its
occurrence. A woman with heterotopic pregnancy underwent urgent
laparoscopy because of abdominal hemorrhage. The postoperative course
was complicated by abdominal pain, ascites, bowel dysfunction, and renal
failure, which resolved rapidly after catheterization and paracentesis.
In this case, abdominal compartment syndrome developed after
unremarkable laparoscopy, and appeared to be triggered by change of
progesterone formulation. Decompression by paracentesis was lifesaving,
and led to rapid resolution of the symptoms.
Sonne, M. and J. Hillingso (2008). "[Intraabdominal
hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome]." Ugeskr Laeger
170(7): 527-31.
Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment
syndrome (ACS) are rare conditions with high mortality. IAH is an
intraabdominal pressure (IAP) above 12 mmHg and ACS an IAP above 20 mmHg
with evidence of organ dysfunction. IAP is measured indirectly via the
bladder or stomach. Various medical and surgical conditions increase the
intraabdominal volume. When the content exceeds the compliance of the
abdominal wall, the IAP rises. Increased IAP affects the functioning of
the brain, lungs, circulation, kidneys, and bowel. The treatment of ACS
is a reduction of IAP.
Spencer, P., L. Kinsman, et al. (2008). "A critical care
nurse's guide to intra abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment
syndrome." Aust Crit Care
21(1): 18-28.
Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening
syndrome that is increasing in incidence amongst critically ill
patients. A 2005 survey of critical care nurses revealed that there were
recognised knowledge deficits of ACS amongst surveyed nurses. The
purpose of this review is to inform critical care nurses about ACS and
its antecedent, intra abdominal hypertension (IAH). Detection
techniques, causes, clinical manifestations and pathophysiology of IAH
and ACS will be outlined and medical and nursing management will be
reviewed. The incidence of ACS is reported to be up to 35% in the
intensive care population with reduced survival when compared to other
intensive care patients. Physiological changes that occur with ACS
include compromise to the cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and
neurological systems and development of metabolic acidosis. Management
may incorporate percutaneous drainage of ascitic fluid, use of muscle
relaxants, prone positioning and surgical intervention to open,
decompress and gradually close the abdomen. Throughout this care the
critical care nurse should ensure accurate monitoring of organ function,
assessment for recurrence of ACS as well as the amount and type of
drainage, appropriate wound management and provision of physical and
psychosocial support of the patient. These aspects of care have the
potential to impact significantly on patient outcome.
Sturini, E., A. Saporito, et al. (2008). "Respiratory
variation of intra-abdominal pressure: indirect indicator of abdominal
compliance?" Intensive Care Med.
OBJECTIVE: To assess if the observed respiratory cycle-related
variation in intra-abdominal pressure is reliably quantifiable and a
possible indirect indicator of abdominal compliance. Secondary issues
were to assess the roles played by respiratory parameters in determining
this oscillation and by patients' position in increasing their
intra-abdominal pressure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational
study in a 26-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS:
Sixteen consecutive patients admitted to intensive care for at least 24
h, requiring mechanical ventilation and intra-abdominal pressure
monitoring. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intra-abdominal pressure was
measured with a modified Kron technique; its waveform was recorded and
inspiratory and expiratory values were measured during five consecutive
respiratory cycles for 5 days, both in the supine and the 30 degrees
head-up position. Inspiratory values were significantly higher than
expiratory values (p = 0.001) and a correlation was found between their
difference and intra-abdominal pressure basal values (p = 0.025). A
positive linear relationship was shown between intra-abdominal pressure
and the amplitude of its oscillation (r = 0.4), particularly in the
subgroup of patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (r = 0.9).
Intra-abdominal pressure was lower in patients supine than in the 30
degrees head-up position (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory
cycle-related variations in intra-abdominal pressure were specifically
investigated, quantified and shown as linearly increasing with
end-expiratory intra-abdominal pressure; this phenomenon could be
explained by patients' abdominal compliance status. Supine posture
should be an important consideration in specific patients affected by
intra-abdominal hypertension.
Sukhotnik, I., J. Mogilner, et al. (2008). "Effect of
elevated intra-abdominal pressure and 100% oxygen on superior mesenteric
artery blood flow and enterocyte turnover in a rat." Pediatr Surg Int.
PURPOSE: Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has been shown
to reduce mesenteric blood flow and cause intestinal damage. The purpose
of the present study was to evaluate the effects of IAP and hyperoxia on
superior mesenteric artery (SMA) blood flow, enterocyte proliferation
and apoptosis in a rat model of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).
METHODS: Male rats underwent midline laparotomy. SMA was isolated and
ultrasonic blood flow probes were placed on the vessel for continuous
measurement of regional blood flow. Two catheters were introduced into
the peritoneal cavity for inflation of air and for measurement of IAP.
Rats were divided into three experimental groups: (1) Sham rats were
subjected to IAP of 0 mmHg, (2) ACS-air rats were subjected to IAP of 6
mmHg for 2 h and were ventilated with air, and (3) ACS-O(2) rats were
subjected to IAP of 6 mmHg and were ventilated with 100% oxygen (O(2))
during the operation and for 6 h after the operation. Intestinal
structural changes, enterocyte proliferation and enterocyte apoptosis
were evaluated at 24 h after operation. A paired Student's t test and
the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test were used as indicated. P <
0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: IAP at 6 mmHg
caused a moderate decrease in SMA blood flow. Inhalation of 100% oxygen
resulted in a trend toward an increase in SMA flow when compared to
air-ventilated animals. ACS rats demonstrated a significantly lower
index of proliferation in jejunum and ileum as well as a significantly
greater apoptotic index in jejunum compared to sham animals. Exposure to
100% oxygen resulted in a significant increase in cell proliferation in
jejunum and ileum as well as in a significant decrease in cell apoptosis
in jejunum compared to air-breathing animals. CONCLUSIONS: In a rat
model of ACS, elevated IAP decreases SMA blood flow and inhibits
enterocyte turnover. Hyperoxia results in a trend toward an increase in
SMA blood flow, increases enterocyte proliferation and inhibits cell
death via apoptosis. These findings may have significant implications
for ventilation strategies during laparoscopy.
Tavares-de la Paz, L. A., P. Andrade-de la Garza, et al.
(2008). "[Open abdomen. Evolution in management.]." Cir Cir
76(2): 177-86.
The open abdomen (OA) strategy is accepted in the treatment of
extremely ill surgical patients. Its usage has increased in the last
decade as the understanding of its functions, advantages and
disadvantages increases. Unfortunately, it continues to be associated
with very high morbidity and mortality, and the different techniques
used to protect the intra-abdominal contents cannot be standardized for
all surgical circumstances. The objective is to review the origins,
actual indications and controversies of the staged abdominal repair
(STAR) and to report on the latest and most used techniques to ensure an
optimal temporary abdominal closure (TAC). A search was done in Medline
and Ovid for articles with key words of open abdomen, temporary
abdominal closure and staged abdominal repair. We found the use of the
technique is justified in patients with trauma, abdominal compartment
syndrome and patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis. The technique
used for TAC must always be individualized for each clinical
circumstance. The best reported results have been obtained with the
vacuum pack technique. In our own experience and as a general rule we
discouraged the use of mesh to protect intra-abdominal contents. The
strategy of OA is useful in complex surgical situations in extremely ill
patients. Its use must be very carefully evaluated, knowing the
potentially serious complications that the patient may develop with its
use.
Tenke, P., B. Kovacs, et al. (2008). "European and Asian
guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary
tract infections." Int J Antimicrob Agents
31 Suppl 1: S68-78.
We surveyed the extensive literature regarding the development,
therapy and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs).
We systematically searched for meta-analyses of randomised controlled
trials available in Medline giving preference to the Cochrane Central
Register of Controlled Trials and also considered other relevant
publications, rating them on the basis of their quality. The studies'
recommendations, rated according to a modification of the US Department
of Health and Human Services (1992), give a close-to-evidence-based
guideline for all medical disciplines, with special emphasis on urology
where catheter care is an important issue. The survey found that the
urinary tract is the commonest source of nosocomial infection,
particularly when the bladder is catheterised (IIa). Most
catheter-associated UTIs are derived from the patient's own colonic
flora (IIb) and the catheter predisposes to UTI in several ways. The
most important risk factor for the development of catheter-associated
bacteriuria is the duration of catheterisation (IIa). Most episodes of
short-term catheter-associated bacteriuria are asymptomatic and are
caused by a single organism (IIa). Further organisms tend to be acquired
by patients catheterised for more than 30 days. The clinician should be
aware of two priorities: the catheter system should remain closed and
the duration of catheterisation should be minimal (A). While the
catheter is in place, systemic antimicrobial treatment of asymptomatic
catheter-associated bacteriuria is not recommended (A), except for some
special cases. Routine urine culture in an asymptomatic catheterised
patient is also not recommended (C) because treatment is in general not
necessary. Antibiotic treatment is recommended only for symptomatic
infection (B). Long-term antibiotic suppressive therapy is not effective
(A). Antibiotic irrigation of the catheter and bladder is of no
advantage (A). Routine urine cultures are not recommended if the
catheter is draining properly (C). A minority of patients can be managed
with the use of the non-return (flip) valve catheter, avoiding the
closed drainage bag. Such patients may exchange the convenience of
on-demand drainage with an increased risk of infection. Patients with
urethral catheters in place for 10 years or more should be screened
annually for bladder cancer (C). Clinicians should always consider
alternatives to indwelling urethral catheters that are less prone to
causing symptomatic infection. In appropriate patients, suprapubic
catheters, condom drainage systems and intermittent catheterisation are
each preferable to indwelling urethral catheterisation (B).
Timerbulatov, V. M., R. R. Faiazov, et al. (2008).
"[Abdominal compartment syndrome in urgent surgery]." Khirurgiia
(Mosk)(7): 33-5.
Results of measurement and monitoring of intraabdominal pressure
at 288 patients treated for different abdominal diseases and trauma were
analyzed. In early postoperative period the increase intraabdominal
pressure to 10-15 mm Hg (I degree) was revealed at 161 (56.0%) patients,
from 16 to 25 mm Hg (II degree)--at 95 (33.0%), from 25 to 35 mm Hg (III
degree)--at 23 (8.0%), more 35 mm Hg (IV degree)--at 8 (2.7%) patients.
When intraabdominal pressure decreased on 4-5 mm per day the prognosis
was positive at 257 (89.2%) operated patients. Critical type regarded as
compartment syndrome (III-IV degree) was diagnosed at 31 (10.8%)
patients. Relaparotomy was performed at 23 (8.0%) patients with III
degree hypertension, the lethal outcome was at 6 (26.1%) cases.
Relaparotomy at 8 (2.7%) patients with IV degree hypertension was late,
and all the outcomes at these patients were lethal. General lethality at
compartment syndrome was 45.2%. It is concluded that monitoring of
intraabdominal hypertension should be mandatory diagnostic method, and
critical parameters of abdominal hypertension--absolute indication to
repeated laparotomy and decompression of abdominal cavity.
Tsuchida, T., K. Makimoto, et al. (2008). "Relationship
between catheter care and catheter-associated urinary tract infection at
Japanese general hospitals: a prospective observational study." Int J
Nurs Stud 45(3): 352-61.
BACKGROUND: The risk factors for catheter-associated urinary
tract infections (CAUTIs) that are associated with catheter care have
not been examined in detail by prospective studies or randomised
clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To examine the patterns of catheter care
and to identify the CAUTI risk factors associated with catheter care.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: Between January and
December 2004, 555 adult patients who were catheterised for 3 days in
five general hospitals in Japan were surveyed. One researcher collected
the following data twice a week: catheter insertion method, catheter
management, and signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections. The
relative risk exceeding 1 by the Poisson regression were selected for
Cox proportional hazard analysis in order to calculate adjusted risks.
In addition, expected reductions in the incidence of CAUTIs by
elimination of the risk factors were estimated using the population
attributable risk percent. RESULTS: The mean duration of catheterisation
was 25 days. The overall incidence of CAUTIs was 3.9 cases per
1000-device days; the incidence of CAUTIs ranged from 0.6 to 7.2 cases
per 1000-device days among the five hospitals. Only fecal incontinent
patients were analysed since they accounted for 94% of the CAUTI cases.
In the univariate analysis, the silver-alloy catheter, which contains
antimicrobial property, emerged as a potential risk. Since silver-alloy
catheters were used in only one hospital, silver-alloy catheter care was
compared with that of the other types of catheter, and a significantly
higher percentage of inappropriate care was observed. In the final Cox
model, two variables remained: 'non-pre-connected closed system
(standard system)' (RR 2.35, 95%CI 1.20-4.60, p = 0.013) and 'no daily
cleansing of the perineal area' (RR 2.49, 95%CI 1.32-4.69, p = 0.005).
The population attributable risk percent suggested that the use of a
'pre-connected closed system' and 'daily cleansing of the perineal area'
could reduce the incidence of CAUTIs by nearly 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Our
investigation identified fecal incontinence as the major risk factor for
CAUTIs in the study population. However, attributable risk percent
indicates that the implementation of two basic elements of catheter care
could reduce CAUTIs by nearly 50%. The hospital using silver-alloy
catheters had the highest CAUTI rates, strongly suggesting the hazards
of relying on the antimicrobial property of silver and the resultant
laxity in care.
Umgelter, A., W. Reindl, et al. (2008). "Effects of plasma
expansion with albumin and paracentesis on haemodynamics and kidney
function in critically ill cirrhotic patients with tense ascites and
hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective uncontrolled trial." Crit Care
12(1): R4.
INTRODUCTION: Circulatory dysfunction in cirrhotic patients may
cause a specific kind of functional renal failure termed hepato-renal
syndrome (HRS). It contributes to the high incidence of renal failure in
cirrhotic intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Fluid therapy may
aggravate renal failure by increasing ascites and intra-abdominal
pressure (IAP). This study investigates the short-term effects of
paracentesis on haemodynamics and kidney function in volume resuscitated
patients with HRS. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive cirrhotic patients with
HRS were studied. Circulatory parameters and renal function were
analysed before and after plasma expansion and paracentesis.
Haemodynamic monitoring was performed by transpulmonary thermodilution.
RESULTS: After infusion of 200 ml of 20% human albumin solution, mean
arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure remained unchanged.
Global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) increased from 791 ml m(-2)
(693 to 862) (median and 25th to 75th percentile) to 844 ml m(-2) (751
to 933). Cardiac index (CI) increased from 4.1 l min(-1) m(-2) (3.6 to
5.0) to 4.7 l min(-1) m(-2) (4.0 to 5.8), whereas systemic vascular
resistance index (SVRI) decreased from 1,422 dyn s cm(-5) m(-2) (1,081
to 1,772) to 1,171 dyn s cm(-5) m(-2) (893 to 1,705). Creatinine
clearance (CC) and fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) were not
affected. During paracentesis, IAP decreased from 22 mmHg (18 to 24) to
9 mmHg (8 to 12). MAP decreased from 81 mmHg (74 to 100) to 80 mmHg (71
to 89), and CI increased from 4.1 l min(-1) m(-2) (3.2 to 4.3) to 4.2 l
min(-1) m(-2) (3.6 to 4.7), whereas SVRI decreased from 1,639 dyn s
cm(-5) m(-2) (1,168 to 2,037) to 1,301 dyn s cm(-5) m(-2) (1,124 to
1,751). CC during the 12-hour interval after paracentesis was
significantly higher than during the 12 hours before (33 ml min(-1) (16
to 50) compared with 23 ml min(-1) (12 to 49)). CC remained elevated for
the rest of the observation period. FeNa increased after paracentesis
but returned to baseline levels after 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Paracentesis
with parameter-guided fluid substitution and maintenance of central
blood volume may improve renal function and is safe in the treatment of
ICU patients with hepato-renal failure.
van Ramshorst, G. H., J. F. Lange, et al. (2008).
"Non-invasive measurement of intra-abdominal pressure: a preliminary
study." Physiol Meas 29(8):
N41-N47.
The importance of measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has
increased since the negative effects of sustained increased IAP, also
known as intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), have become known. The
relation between IAP and abdominal wall tension has been included in
several reports. We have developed a device to measure abdominal wall
tension by measuring force and distance. This device enables us to
investigate the correlation between the abdominal wall tension and IAP.
The abdomens of two corpses (one female, one male) were insufflated with
air. IAP was increased and measured at intervals by means of a
laparoscopic set-up. Abdominal tension was measured at seven points on
the abdominal wall at each interval. Pearson's correlation coefficients
were used to determine the relationship between IAP and tension for each
point measured. ANOVA was used to assess relations between measured
tensions versus applied pressure, locations and subjects. In both
corpses, all points showed significant (p < 0.001) correlations between
IAP and abdominal wall tension. The points along the mid transverse
plane appear to be more similar compared to more cranial and caudal
points. We have assessed the feasibility of a device that non-invasively
can track changes in IAP. Measurements performed with the device are
preliminary results, and further investigation is needed.
Vegar-Brozovic, V., J. Brezak, et al. (2008).
"Intra-abdominal hypertension: pulmonary and cerebral complications."
Transplant Proc 40(4):
1190-2.
Intra-abdominal hypertension causes many physiologic changes,
primarily by reducing thoracic compliance and secondarily causing organ
failure, which is the body's normal response to trauma or acute
inflammatory response. Compartment syndrome as a cause of abdominal
hypertension has adverse effects on the circulation, threatening the
function and viability of tissues. Intra-abdominal hypertension with the
clinical picture of compartment syndrome is a reperfusion injury that is
a cyclic event. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure due to whatever
mechanism affects all intra-abdominal viscera, including the abdominal
wall. Due to edema reducing thoracic compliance, producing severe
encephalopathy and leading to severe ischemia with generation of
significant quantities of reactive oxygen free radicals as well
peroxidation products released from the intestine, liver and spleen.
Elevated intracranial pressure causes encephalopathy and the risk of
neuronal damage due to the sharp decrease in cerebral perfusion
pressure. Elevated intracranial pressure is due to restriction of
outflow from the lumbar venous plexus. The etiology of the sudden
increase in capillary permeability remains unclear. Decompressive
laparotomy leads to a rapid improvement in pulmonary parameters and
oxygen delivery. The clinical state after decompression is an example of
ischemia-reperfusion injury requiring therapy with inotropes and other
agents to improve cardiac, respiratory, renal and cerebral hemodynamics
with life saving effects.
Vidal, M. G., J. Ruiz Weisser, et al. (2008). "Incidence and
clinical effects of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill
patients." Crit Care Med 36(6): 1823-31.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the
epidemiology and outcomes of intra-abdominal hypertension in a
heterogeneous intensive care unit population. DESIGN: This was a
prospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a
medical-surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS:
Study patients included all those consecutively admitted during 9
months, staying > 24 hrs, and requiring bladder catheterization.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On admission, epidemiologic data and risk
factors for intra-abdominal hypertension were studied; then, daily
maximal and mean intra-abdominal pressures (IAP(max) and IAP(mean)),
abdominal perfusion pressure, fluid balances, filtration gradient, and
sequential organ failure assessment score, were registered. IAPs were
recorded through a bladder catheter every 6 hrs until death, discharge,
or along 7 days. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as IAP > or =
12 mm Hg. Abdominal compartment syndrome was defined as IAP > or = 20 mm
Hg plus > or = 1 new organ failure. Main outcome measure was hospital
mortality. Of 83 patients, considering IAP(max), 31% had intra-abdominal
hypertension on admission and another 33% developed it after (23% and
31% with IAP(mean)). Main risk factors were mechanical ventilation,
acute respiratory distress syndrome, and fluid resuscitation (relative
risk, 5.26, 3.19, and 2.50, respectively). Patients with intra-abdominal
hypertension were sicker, had higher mortality (53% vs. 27%, p = .02),
and consistently showed higher total and renal sequential organ failure
assessment score, daily and cumulative fluid balances, and lower
filtration gradient. Nonsurvivors had higher IAP(max), IAP(mean), and
fluid balances and lower abdominal perfusion pressure. Abdominal
compartment syndrome developed in 12%; 20% survived. Logistic regression
identified IAP(max) as an independent predictor of mortality (odds
ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.30; p = .003) after
adjusting with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and
comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.25; p =
.001; and odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.67; p =
.013, respectively). Models with IAP(mean) and abdominal perfusion
pressure also performed well. Areas under receiver operating
characteristic curves were .81 and .83. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal
hypertension, diagnosed either with IAP(max) or IAP(mean), was frequent
and showed an independent association with mortality. Intra-abdominal
hypertension was significantly associated with more severe organ
failures, particularly renal and respiratory, and a prolonged intensive
care unit stay.
Whitson, B. A. and S. Ikramuddin (2008). "Intra-abdominal
Pressure Cutoffs Should not be Absolutes." World J Surg.
Wolfe, T. R., E. J. Kimball, et al. (2008). "The
interrelationship of severe sepsis, sepsis resuscitation and the
abdominal compartment syndrome." Int J Intensive Care(Spring):
22-29.
In the last 7 years an explosion in interest regarding
interventional therapies for severe sepsis has occurred.
Simultaneously there has been a dramatic increase in the
recognition, understanding and management of intra-abdominal
hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome. What may be less
apparent is the profound inter-relationship between these two disease
processes. Patients suffering septic shock and receiving early goal
directed therapy are almost perfect candidates for developing
intra-abdominal hypertension.
However, the pathophysiologic manifestations of sepsis and
intraabdominal hypertension are so similar that the later syndrome
frequently goes unrecognized and therefor untreated.
Furthermore, elevated intra-abdominal pressure profoundly
influences commonly used septic shock resuscitation endpoints such as
CVP (falsely elevated) and urine output (markedly decreased). Failure to
adjust for the impact of intraabdominal pressure on these endpoints may
negatively impact resuscitation decisions, potentially worsening sepsis
patients’ outcomes.
This manuscript will review the inter-relationships between severe
sepsis, sepsis resuscitation protocols and intraabdominal hypertension.
It will then discuss the clinical reasoning and outcomes data that
suggest that patients who undergo sepsis resuscitation should have
intraabdominal pressure monitoring started during the resuscitation
phase and intraabdominal hypertension interventional therapies
implemented, if necessary, during the management-bundle phase.
Xia, G. X. (2008). "[Reiteration on abdominal compartment
syndrome]." Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi
24(2): 81-3.
Since we called for the attention of the occurrence of abdominal
compartment syndrome in 2002, forty cases of this complication have been
recognized and reported by six burn units in this journal, including
three cases accompanied with massive pleural effusion (1601 - 3240 mL).
Most cases emerged after "aggressive" fluid resuscitation, especially
after massive infusion of crystalloid fluid. The idea "more fluid no
harm" should be corrected. The goal of early fluid resuscitation in burn
is to correct the hypovolemia and cell hypoxia, and circulating fluid
just serves as a carrier in bringing O2 to the cells and carrying out
CO2 and other metabolites from tissues. In face of "leaking while
infusing", heavy accumulation of fluid in the third spaces may worsen
the cell hypoxia. Some of the parameters we get from invasive monitoring
systems can be misleading. Now, the trend of overloading should be
prevented, and it behaves us to study the regime of lower fluid volume
with proper contents in burn shock resuscitation.
Xia, Z. F. and G. Y. Wang (2008). "[Discussion on the fluid
resuscitation and monitoring during burn shock period]." Zhonghua
Shao Shang Za Zhi 24(4):
241-4.
The index of monitoring burn shock resuscitation includes
clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory examinations, hemodynamic
variables. In recent years, there exists a tendency that the amount of
transfused fluid for burn shock resuscitation is notably increased and
complications of some cases, such as abdominal compartment syndrome have
been reported. One of the major reasons for excessive fluid
resuscitation is to try to normalize hemodynamic parameters with the
help of invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Instead of hemodynamic
variables, urinary output combined with other traditional variables
still should be considered primary criteria of adequate fluid therapy.
Specification of the variables of monitoring burn shock resuscitation is
also the basis to revise and optimize the fluid resuscitation formula.
Yokoyama, A., N. Dairaku, et al. (2008). "[Autopsy case of
abdominal compartment syndrome in a patient with schizophrenia]."
Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi
105(8): 1205-12.
A 61-year-old man who had taken several kinds of psychotropic
agents for schizophrenia from eighteen was admitted due to acute
abdomen. In spite of any treatment he died after arrival. The autopsy
revealed marked dilation of gastrointestinal tracts without necrosis
through stomach to rectum and pathological examination disclosed
hypoganglionosis of whole gastrointestinal wall. We thought that he died
of abdominal compartment syndrome as a result of acute on chronic
secondary pseudo-obstruction of gastrointestinal tracts due to acquired
hypoganglionosis, megacolon, and aerophagia.
Zengerink, I., P. B. McBeth, et al. (2008). "Validation and
experience with a simple continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement
technique in a multidisciplinary medical/surgical critical care unit."
J Trauma 64(5):
1159-64.
BACKGROUND: Raised intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) or
intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) may induce many adverse effects
including the abdominal compartment syndrome. We evaluated a new
technique for continuous monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure (CIAP)
using a standard three-way bladder catheter in a diverse group of
intensive care unit patients. METHODS: CIAP measured using a standard
three-way bladder catheter was compared with five standard intermittent
IAP (IIAP) measurements in 79 patients. RESULTS: Mean (standard
deviation) CIAP was identical (15.4 mm Hg [5.8]) for CIAP and IIAP one
minute after saline injection. Mean differences between methods were
less than 1 mm Hg, and similar whether IIAP was measured at 1 minute, 2
minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes, or 5 minutes. Bland-Altman analysis
comparing CIAP and IIAP (1 minute) revealed a mean difference (95%
confidence interval) of -0.06 mm Hg (-0.51, 0.39). Limits of agreement
were -4.12 mm Hg to 4.00 mm Hg. Considering gradations of IAH defined by
the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, CIAP was
sensitive for detecting slightly elevated IAP (>11 mm Hg) but is less
sensitive for distinguishing between higher grades of IAH (e.g.,
pressures >20 mm Hg or 25 mm Hg). Limits of agreement were best for
patients with IAP less than 20 mm Hg, surgical or traumatic diagnoses
and for patients with BMI less than 26. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, CIAP is an
accurate and simple means of measuring IAP when compared with the
current standardized method. Elevated CIAP measurements should be
confirmed with IIAP measurements if accurate grading is required until
further validation and experience is obtained.
Zhang, M. J., G. L. Zhang, et al. (2008). "Treatment of
abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis patients
with traditional Chinese medicine." World J Gastroenterol
14(22): 3574-8.
AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese
traditional medicines Da Cheng Qi Decoction (Timely-Purging and
Yin-Preserving Decoction) and Glauber's salt combined with conservative
measures on abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in severe acute
pancreatitis (SAP) patients. METHODS: Eighty consecutive SAP patients,
admitted for routine non-operative conservative treatment, were randomly
divided into study group and control group (40 patients in each group).
Patients in the study group received Da Cheng Qi Decoction enema for 2 h
and external use of Glauber's salt, once a day for 7 d. Patients in the
control group received normal saline (NS) enema. Routine non-operative
conservative treatments included non-per os nutrition (NPON),
gastrointestinal decompression, life support, total parenteral nutrition
(TPN), continuous peripancreatic vascular pharmaceutical infusion and
drug therapy. Intra-cystic pressure (ICP) of the two groups was measured
during treatment. The effectiveness and outcomes of treatment were
observed and APACHE II scores were applied in analysis. RESULTS: On days
4 and 5 of treatment, the ICP was lower in the study group than in the
control group (P < 0.05). On days 3-5 of treatment, acute physiology and
chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores for the study and
control groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). Both the
effectiveness and outcome of the treatment with Da Cheng Qi Decoction on
abdominalgia, burbulence relief time, ascites quantity, cyst formation
rate and hospitalization time were quite different between the two
groups (P < 0.05). The mortality rate for the two groups had no
significant difference. CONCLUSION: Da Cheng Qi Decoction enema and
external use of Glauber's salt combined with routine non-operative
conservative treatment can decrease the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
of SAP patients and have preventive and therapeutic effects on abdominal
compartment syndrome of SAP.
|