IAH/ACS ARTICLE ABSTRACTS 2009:

Atila, K., C. Terzi, et al. (2009). "What Is the Role of the Abdominal Perfusion Pressure for Subclinical Hepatic Dysfunctionin Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?" J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A.

               Abstract Background: Subclinical hepatic dysfunction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been described in the literature. However, this alteration is not encountered in all patients. In order to address this situation, a prospective study was conducted to investigate the effect of abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) on liver function tests after LC performed under constant intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Patients and Methods: Of 78 patients who underwent LC between May 2007 and October 2007, 40 patients were eligible for the study. In all the patients, six parameters of liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase) were assessed before and 24 hours after surgery. Patients who showed more than a 100% increase in at least one parameter (group 1) were compared to those who did not (group 2) regarding age, sex, body weight, body height, operation time, pneumoperitoneum time, IAP, preoperative, and intraoperative APP. Results: Of the patients, 37.5% showed more than a 100% increase in at least one parameter of liver function. No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to age, sex, body weight, body height, operation time, pneumoperitoneum time, and IAP. There were significant increase in AST and ALT at 24 hours postoperatively in group 1, as compared with group 2 (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). In comparison of preoperative APP with intraoperative APP values, group 1 showed a statistically significant decrease (P = 0.000), while no difference was found in group 2. Conclusion: Subclinical hepatic dysfunction after LC could mostly be attributed to the negative effects of the pneumoperitoneum on hepatic blood flow. For the evaluation of hepatic hypoperfusion, APP may be a new criterion as a determinant of interaction with mean arterial pressure (MAP) and IAP.

Azzopardi, E. A., B. McWilliams, et al. (2009). "Fluid resuscitation in adults with severe burns at risk of secondary abdominal compartment syndrome-An evidence based systematic review." Burns.

               BACKGROUND: Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (sACS) in adults with severe burns is commonly unsuspected, can be rapidly fatal and seriously compromises the reliability of urine output as an indicator of perfusion and resuscitation status. Current literature lacks an exhaustive, evidence-based review critically appraising all retrieved literature on which clinical decisions may be based. METHODS: The evidence on three inter-related concepts was evaluated: fluid-volume management and its contribution to sACS; the role of urinary bladder pressure monitoring; and awareness of the burns community to sACS. Literature published over the last ten years across the major databases was retrieved, and the search strategy was fully reported to reduce the retrieval bias ubiquitous in previous literature. Each article was individually appraised and classified into a framework of evidence, enabling the formulation of specific, graded recommendations. RESULTS: Current best evidence supports recommendations to reduce fluid-volume administered through use of colloids or hypertonic saline especially if the projected resuscitation volume surpasses a 'volume ceiling'. Continuous intra-vesical monitoring is recommended: to guide fluid resuscitation for early diagnosis of sACS; and as a guide to reliability of urine output as indicator of organ perfusion. A priming volume of 75cm(3) or less is recommended. CONCLUSION: Fluid resuscitation volume is causative to sACS, especially once a predetermined maxima is reached. Continuous intra-vesical pressure monitoring is a cheap, reliable, user-friendly monitoring method recommended in high-risk patients. Poor awareness among the burns community requires urgent dissemination of evidence based information.

Balogh, Z. J., K. van Wessem, et al. (2009). "Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome: are we winning the battle?" World J Surg 33(6): 1134-41.

               Postinjury (primary) abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) was described more than 15 years ago as severe abdominal distension with high peak airway pressures, CO(2) retention, and oliguria, which led to unplanned re-exploration after damage-control laparotomy. Later, a more elusive type of ACS was recognized, which develops without abdominal injuries (secondary ACS). Both syndromes were recently characterized, their independent predictors were identified, and preventive strategies were developed to reduce their incidence. Once viewed as a syndrome with almost uniform mortality, systematic preventative strategies and therapeutic efforts have reduced the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality of the syndrome. This review was designed to summarize the recent advances in the management of ACS, to classify the currently available evidence, and to identify future directions of research and clinical care.

Benninger, E., M. W. Laschke, et al. (2009). "Intra-abdominal pressure development after different temporary abdominal closure techniques in a porcine model." J Trauma 66(4): 1118-24.

               BACKGROUND: Decompressive laparotomy followed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC) is an established prophylaxis and treatment for abdominal compartment syndrome. The herein presented study aimed at the comparison of volume reserve capacity and development of intra-abdominal hypertension after forced primary abdominal closure and different TAC techniques in a porcine model. METHODS: Eight anesthesized and mechanically ventilated domestic pigs underwent a standardized midline laparotomy. A bag was placed into the abdominal cavity. Before abdominal closure, the bag was prefilled with 3,000 mL water to simulate increased intra-abdominal volume. The intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was then increased in 2 mm Hg steps up to 30 mm Hg by adding volume (volume reserve capacity) to the intra-abdominal bag. Volume reserve capacity with the corresponding IAP were analyzed and compared for primary abdominal closure, bag silo closure, a zipper system, and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) with different negative pressures (-50, -100, and -150 mm Hg). Hemodynamic and pulmonary parameters were monitored throughout the experiment. RESULTS: Volume reserve capacity was the highest for bag silo closure followed by the zipper system and VAC with primary abdominal closure providing the least volume reserve capacity in the whole IAP range. Of interest, VAC -50 mm Hg resulted in a lower volume reserve capacity when compared with VAC -100 and -150 mm Hg. Pulmonary and hemodynamic parameters demonstrated no significant differences between primary abdominal closure and the evaluated TAC techniques at all IAP levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present experimental in vivo study indicates that bag silo closure and zipper systems may be favorable TAC techniques after decompressive laparotomy. In contrast, the VAC techniques resulted in lower volume reserve capacity and therefore may bear an increased risk for recurrent intra-abdominal hypertension in the initial phase after decompressive laparotomy.

Bryan, S. and S. Dukes (2009). "Case study: negative pressure wound therapy in an abdominal wound." Br J Nurs 18(6): S15-6, S18, S20-1.

               This article explores the history and management of large abdominal wounds and the importance of a multi-disciplinary team approach to wound healing. It identifies the difficulties of using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in a patient with a large abdominal wound, which is further complicated by an ileostomy. NPWT is increasingly used for large wounds with positive outcomes, however, the case study demonstrates the many difficulties involved and how they were overcome. Cavity wounds can take weeks, or even months to heal and many patients become frustrated. This can have a significant impact on their quality of life. Prolonged hospitalization is not only devastating to the patient and family both physically, psychologically and financially, but is also costly in terms of nursing time and resources.

Carlotti, A. P. and W. B. Carvalho (2009). "Abdominal compartment syndrome: A review." Pediatr Crit Care Med 10(1): 115-20.

               OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were to summarize a) the consensus definitions of normal and pathologic intra-abdominal pressure (IAP); b) the techniques to measure IAP; c) the risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS); d) the pathophysiology of ACS; and e) the current recommendations for management and prevention of ACS. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched using the following terms: ACS, IAH, IAP, and abdominal decompression. DATA SYNTHESIS: ACS represents the natural progression of end-organ dysfunction caused by increased IAP and develops if IAH is not recognized and treated appropriately. Although the reported incidence of ACS is relatively low in critically ill children (0.6%-4.7%) it may be under-recognized and under-reported. The diagnosis of IAH/ACS depends on a high index of suspicion and the accurate and frequent measurement of IAP in patients at risk. Mortality from ACS remains high (50%-60%) even when decompression of the abdomen is performed early, which highlights the importance of detection and treatment of elevated IAP before end-organ damage occurs. CONCLUSIONS: A widespread awareness of the recognition and current approach to management and prevention of IAH and ACS is needed among pediatric intensivists, so outcome of these life-threatening disease processes might be improved.

Cheatham, M. L. (2009). "Abdominal compartment syndrome." Curr Opin Crit Care 15(2): 154-62.

               PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), the pathophysiologic implications of elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP), have detrimental effects on all organ systems and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Within the past few years, the diagnosis and management of these syndromes have evolved tremendously. RECENT FINDINGS: Consensus definitions and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of IAH/ACS have been proposed. Risk factors for IAH/ACS have been clearly defined. The timing and techniques for IAP measurement have been further described. A comprehensive evidence-based medical and surgical approach to the treatment of IAH/ACS has been developed. SUMMARY: Liberal IAP measurement in the presence of known risk factors combined with implementation of an evolving and comprehensive resuscitation strategy have resulted in significant improvements in both short and long-term outcome for patients who develop IAH/ACS. All clinicians should be aware of the risk factors that predict development of IAH/ACS, the appropriate measurement of IAP, and the current resuscitation options for managing these highly morbid syndromes.

Cheatham, M. L. (2009). "Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: pathophysiology and definitions." Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 17(1): 10.

               ABSTRACT: "Intra-abdominal hypertension", the presence of elevated intra-abdominal pressure, and "abdominal compartment syndrome", the development of pressure-induced organ-dysfunction and failure, have been increasingly recognized over the past decade as causes of significant morbidity and mortality among critically ill surgical and medical patients. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure can cause significant impairment of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and central nervous system function. The significant prognostic value of elevated intra-abdominal pressure has prompted many intensive care units to adopt measurement of this physiologic parameter as a routine vital sign in patients at risk. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiologic implications of elevated intra-abdominal pressure is fundamental to 1) recognizing the presence of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome, 2) effectively resuscitating patients afflicted by these potentially life-threatening diseases, and 3) preventing the development of intra-abdominal pressure-induced end-organ dysfunction and failure. The currently accepted consensus definitions surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are presented.

Cheatham, M. L. (2009). "Nonoperative management of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome." World J Surg 33(6): 1116-22.

               Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have detrimental effects on all organ systems and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In recent years, the diagnosis and management of these syndromes has evolved tremendously, and the importance of comprehensive strategies to reduce intraabdominal pressure (IAP) has been recognized. All clinicians should be aware of the risk factors that predict the development of IAH/ACS, the appropriate measurement of IAP, and the current resuscitation options for managing these highly morbid syndromes. The nonoperative management of IAH/ACS can be summarized using five therapeutic goals: evacuate intraluminal contents, evacuate intraabdominal space-occupying lesions, improve abdominal wall compliance, optimize fluid administration, and optimize systemic and regional tissue perfusion. Surgical intervention through open abdominal decompression should immediately be pursued for patients with progressive IAH, end-organ dysfunction, and failure that is refractory to these nonoperative therapies. This comprehensive management strategy has been demonstrated to improve patient survival and long-term outcome.

Cheatham, M. L., J. J. De Waele, et al. (2009). "The impact of body position on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: A multicenter analysis*." Crit Care Med.

               OBJECTIVE:: Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality among the critically ill patients. IAP is most commonly measured using the intravesicular or "bladder" technique. The impact of changes in body position on the accuracy of IAP measurements, such as head of bed elevation to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, remains unclear. DESIGN:: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING:: Twelve international intensive care units. PATIENTS:: One hundred thirty-two critically ill medical and surgical patients at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. INTERVENTIONS:: Triplicate intravesicular pressure measurements were performed at least 4 hours apart with the patient in the supine, 15 degrees , and 30 degrees head of bed elevated positions. The zero reference point was the mid-axillary line at the iliac crest. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: Mean IAP values at each head of bed position were significantly different (p < 0.0001). The bias between IAPsupine and IAP15 degrees was 1.5 mm Hg (1.3-1.7). The bias between IAPsupine and IAP30 degrees was 3.7 mm Hg (3.4-4.0). CONCLUSIONS:: Head of bed elevation results in clinically significant increases in measured IAP. Consistent body positioning from one IAP measurement to the next is necessary to allow consistent trending of IAP for accurate clinical decision making. Studies that include IAP measurements should include the patient's body position so that these values may be properly interpreted.

Chung, P. H., K. K. Wong, et al. (2009). "Abdominal compartment syndrome after open biopsy in a child with bilateral Wilms' tumour." Hong Kong Med J 15(2): 136-8.

               Although Wilms' tumour is one of the most common solid malignancies in children, bilateral disease is rare. We report a child with bilateral Wilms' tumour who developed abdominal compartment syndrome after an open biopsy.

Cotton, B. A., B. K. Au, et al. (2009). "Predefined massive transfusion protocols are associated with a reduction in organ failure and postinjury complications." J Trauma 66(1): 41-8; discussion 48-9.

               INTRODUCTION: Massive transfusion (MT) protocols have been shown to improve survival in severely injured patients. However, others have noted that these higher fresh frozen plasma (FFP):red blood cell (RBC) ratios are associated with increased risk of organ failure. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MT protocols are associated with increased organ failure and complications. METHODS: Our institution's exsanguination protocol (TEP) involves the immediate delivery of products in a 3:2 ratio of RBC:FFP and 5:1 for RBC:platelets. All patients receiving TEP between February 2006 and January 2008 were compared with a cohort (pre-TEP) of all patients from February 2004 to January 2006 that (1) went immediately to the operating room and (2) received MT (>or=10 units of RBC in first 24 hours). RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four patients met inclusion (125 in the TEP group, 141 in the pre-TEP). Demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar. TEP received more intraoperative FFP and platelets but less in first 24 hours (p < 0.01). There was no difference in renal failure or systemic inflammatory response syndrome, but pneumonia, pulmonary failure, open abdomens, and abdominal compartment syndrome were lower in TEP. In addition, severe sepsis or septic shock and multiorgan failure were both lower in the TEP patients (9% vs. 20%, p = 0.011 and 16% vs. 37%, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although MT has been associated with higher organ failure and complication rates, this risk appears to be reduced when blood products are delivered early in the resuscitation through a predefined protocol. Our institution's TEP was associated with a reduction in multiorgan failure and infectious complications, as well as an increase in ventilator-free days. In addition, implementation of this protocol was followed by a dramatic reduction in development of abdominal compartment syndrome and the incidence of open abdomens.

Dambrauskas, Z., A. Parseliunas, et al. (2009). "Early recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with acute pancreatitis." World J Gastroenterol 15(6): 717-21.

               AIM: To assess the value of widely used clinical scores in the early identification of acute pancreatitis (AP) patients who are likely to suffer from intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Patients (n = 44) with AP recruited in this study were divided into two groups (ACS and non-ACS) according to intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) determined by indirect measurement using the transvesical route via Foley bladder catheter. On admission and at regular intervals, the severity of the AP and presence of organ dysfunction were assessed utilizing different multifactorial prognostic systems: Glasgow-Imrie score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score, and Multiorgan Dysfunction Score (MODS). The diagnostic performance of scores predicting ACS development, cut-off values and specificity and sensitivity were established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of ACS in our study population was 19.35%. IAP at admission in the ACS group was 22.0 (18.5-25.0) mmHg and 9.25 (3.0-12.4) mmHg in the non-ACS group (P < 0.01). Univariate statistical analysis revealed that patients in the ACS group had significantly higher multifactorial clinical scores (APACHE II, Glasgow-Imrie and MODS) on admission and higher maximal scores during hospitalization (P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis revealed that APACHE II, Glasgow-Imrie, and MODS are valuable tools for early prediction of ACS with high sensitivity and specificity, and that cut-off values are similar to those used for stratification of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). CONCLUSION: IAH and ACS are rare findings in patients with mild AP. Based on the results of our study we recommend measuring the IAP in cases when patients present with SAP (APACHE II > 7; MODS > 2 or Glasgow-Imrie score > 3).

De Keulenaer, B. L., J. J. De Waele, et al. (2009). "What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure?" Intensive Care Med.

               PURPOSE: To describe what is defined as normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and how body positioning, body mass index (BMI) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect IAP monitoring. METHODS: A review of different databases was made (Pubmed, MEDLINE (January 1966-June 2007) and EMBASE.com (January 1966-June 2007)) using the search terms of "IAP", "intra-abdominal hypertension" (IAH), "abdominal compartment syndrome" (ACS), "body positioning", "prone positioning", "PEEP" and "acute respiratory distress syndrome" (ARDS). Prior to 1966, we selected older articles by looking at the reference lists displayed in the more recent papers. RESULTS: This review focuses on the concept that the abdomen truly behaves as a hydraulic system. The definitions of a normal IAP in the general patient population and morbidly obese patients are reviewed. Subsequently, factors that affect the accuracy of IAP monitoring, i.e., body position (head of bed elevation, lateral decubitus and prone position) and PEEP, are explored. CONCLUSION: The abdomen behaves as a hydraulic system with a normal IAP of about 5-7 mmHg, and with higher baseline levels in morbidly obese patients of about 9-14 mmHg. Measuring IAP via the bladder in the supine position is still the accepted standard method, but in patients in the semi-recumbent position (head of the bed elevated to 30 degrees and 45 degrees ), the IAP on average is 4 and 9 mmHg, respectively, higher. Future research should be focused on developing and validating predictive equations to correct for supine IAP towards the semi-recumbent position. Small increases in IAP in stable patients without IAH, turned prone, have no detrimental effects. The role of prone positioning in the unstable patient with or without IAH still needs to be established.

De Waele, J. J. and A. K. Leppaniemi (2009). "Intra-abdominal hypertension in acute pancreatitis." World J Surg 33(6): 1128-33.

               The incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is approximately 60-80%. It is usually an early phenomenon, partly related to the effects of the inflammatory process, causing retroperitoneal edema, fluid collections, ascites, and ileus, and partly iatrogenic, resulting from aggressive fluid resuscitation. It also can manifest at a later stage, often associated with local pancreatic complications. IAH is associated with impaired organ dysfunction, especially of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal systems. Using current definitions, the incidence of the clinical manifestation, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), has been reported as 27% in the largest study so far. Despite several intervention options, the mortality in patients developing ACS remains high: 50-75%. Prevention with judicious use of crystalloids is important, and nonsurgical interventions, such as nasogastric decompression, short-term use of neuromuscular blockers, removal of fluid by extracorporeal techniques, and percutaneous drainage of ascites should be instituted early. The indications for surgical decompression are still not clearly defined, but undoubtedly some patients benefit from it. It can be achieved with full-thickness laparostomy (midline or transverse subcostal) or through a subcutaneous linea alba fasciotomy. Despite the improvement in physiological variables and significant decrease in IAP, the effects of surgical decompression on organ function and outcome are less clear. Because of the significant morbidity associated with surgical decompression and the management of the ensuing open abdomen, more research is needed to define better the appropriate indications and techniques for surgical intervention.

Gong, G., P. Wang, et al. (2009). "The role of oxygen-free radical in the apoptosis of enterocytes and bacterial translocation in abdominal compartment syndrome." Free Radic Res 43(5): 470-7.

               BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to study the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) on the intestine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty Sprague-Daley rats were divided into four groups. In the ACS group, the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was increased to 20 mmHg. In the ACS/DE group, increased IAP was followed by decompression. In the control1 and control2 groups, the IAP remained unchanged. Malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), glutathione (GSH) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) enzymes of the intestine were measured. Additionally, ileal tissues were obtained for histopathological examinations and apoptosis detection. Liver, spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes were obtained for microbiological analysis. RESULTS: In the presence of IAH, MDA and MPO were increased, while GSH and GSH-Px were decreased. Microbiological analysis suggested bacterial translocation across the gut. Morphological examinations indicated that the Chiu's score and apoptotic index in the ACS/DE group were the highest in the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oxidative stress plays an important role in the intestinal damage and bacterial translocation in abdominal compartment syndrome. Additionally, the influence of oxygen free radicals occurs mainly during the period of reperfusion rather than during the IAH period.

Gourgiotis, S., C. Villias, et al. (2009). "TNP-assisted fascial closure in a patient with acute abdomen and abdominal compartment syndrome." J Wound Care 18(2): 65-7.

               Topical negative pressure was applied to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome in a patient following surgery for an acute abdomen. It delayed fascial closure, protected the underlying bowel and facilitated abdominal re-entry.

Ibis, C. and A. Altan (2009). "The Value of Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement in Patients with Acute Abdomen." Asian J Surg 32(1): 33-8.

               AIM: To find out the potential benefit of bladder pressure (BP) measurement as a diagnostic tool for acute abdomen. BACKGROUND: Acute abdomen is one of the most important clinical entities among general surgical clinics. The diagnosis can be achieved by considering the patient's history, physical examination, laboratory analysis or by different imaging modalities. Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) occurs due to elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and can be diagnosed by measurement of BP. We observed in our clinical routine elevated IAP levels in patients with acute abdomen. METHODS: Two groups were established: one containing 65 consecutive patients diagnosed as having acute abdomen in the emergency room, and the control group of 10 consecutive patients with no acute abdominal complaints elected for laparoscopic operation. IAP measurements were performed before the operations. BP was measured in the supine position with 50 mL of sterile saline instilled into the bladder after the bladder had been emptied. The catheter was connected to a water manometer with the reference point being the symphisis pubis. BP levels greater than 7 cmH2O were accepted as abnormal and interpreted as a diagnostic criteria for acute abdomen. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the accuracy are calculated 95.4%, 80%, 96.9%, 72.7%, 93.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found elevated IAP may support the physicians diagnosis of acute abdomen with approximately 27.3% false negative rate.

Ivatury, R. R. (2009). "No "canary in the coalmine" for intra-abdominal hypertension." Crit Care Med 37(1): 373-4.

Kaffarnik, M. and S. Utzolino (2009). "[Postoperative Management of Patients with BMI > 40 kg / m2.]." Zentralbl Chir 134(1): 43-9.

               Bariatric surgery, especially in the morbidly obese, can be associated with serious postoperative problems. Apart from surgical complications requiring reoperation, pre-existing disease can worsen during the postoperative period. Bariatric patients require particular therapeutic approaches such as adapted fluid and pain management, management of obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnea, early ambulation and measures for preventing pressure ulcers. Another challenging issue is the early identification and management of postoperative intraabdominal sepsis (IAS) before the onset of organ dysfunction. Early and frequent ambulation is thought to reduce risk of pressure ulcers, deep vein thrombosis, resedation, pain, pneumonia and atelectasis. To prevent spine injury of health care workers it is necessary to provide appropriate support with special beds, lifting and transfer devices.

Kimball, E. J., M. Mone, et al. (2009). "A Prospective Evaluation of the Protocolized Management of Intra-abdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome " Acta Clinica Belgica 64(3): 81 (Abstract 110).

               Introduction: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is a prevalent and highly morbid disease process found in a wide variety of critically ill patients. Protocolized management of complex disease processes can facilitate early recognition, prompt intervention and can lead to reductions in morbidity and mortality. Hypothesis: Protocolized diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients at risk for IAH and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) will reduce the historically high rate of morbidity and mortality associated with this common ICU pathophysiology. Methods: Outcome data was prospectively collected on patients (n=600) at risk for IAH/ACS in a Level I surgical ICU at the University of Utah for a period of 5 years beginning in October of 2004. A detailed clinical protocol for IAH/ACS monitoring and therapy was introduced in June of 2005. The clinical impact of this protocol was assessed by evaluating the morbidity, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, total ventilator days and rate of emergent decompression laparotomy in patients at risk for IAH/ACS before and after protocol implementation. Results: In the 4 year period after protocol implementation patients at risk for IAH/ACS had a relative risk reduction in mortality of 18% (absolute risk reduction from 17.9% to 14.7%). ICU LOS dropped from 14.5 days (±11.3) to 10.5 days (±10.0), total ventilator days from 12.3 days (±9.4) to 8.0 days (±8.7), and the relative risk of SICU emergent decompression laparotomy dropped 40.5% (absolute risk reduction of 23.2% to 13.8%) following implementation of the IAH/ACS clinical protocol. Hospital LOS was unchanged for the IAH/ACS group. Overall SICU mortality remained unchanged at approximately 5% during the study period. Conclusion: IAH/ACS has been established as a direct cause of multi-system organ failure in critically ill patients. Implementation of a detailed clinical protocol for the monitoring and therapy of IAH/ACS can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this life-threatening pathophysiology.

Kirkpatrick, A. W., C. G. Ball, et al. (2009). "Intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome in burn patients." World J Surg 33(6): 1142-9.

               Severe burns represent a devastating injury that induces profound systemic inflammation requiring large volumes of resuscitative fluids. The consequent massive swelling and peritoneal ascites raises intraabdominal pressures (IAP) to supraphysiologic levels commensurate with intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and with the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) if consistently associated with IAP >20 mmHg and associated with new organ failure. Severe burn injuries are an example of the secondary ACS (2 degrees ACS), wherein there has been no primary inciting intraperitoneal injury, yet severe IAH/ACS develops, setting the stage for progressive multiorgan dysfunction. These definitions along with practice management guidelines have recently been promulgated by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) in an effort to standardize terminology and communication regarding IAH/ACS in critical care. It is currently unknown whether these syndromes are iatrogenic consequences of excessive or poorly managed fluid resuscitation or unavoidable sequelae of the primary injury. It occurs frequently with burns of >60% body surface area, especially with associated inhalational injury, delayed resuscitation, and abdominal wall injuries. IAH/ACS is often a hyperacute phenomenon that occurs within the first hours of admission and thereafter with any complication requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation. Despite a number of noninvasive management strategies, interventions such as percutaneous peritoneal drainage and, ultimately, decompressive laparotomy are often required once the ACS is established. Whether novel resuscitation strategies can avoid or minimize IAH/ACS is unproven at present and requires further study. Truly understanding postburn ACS may require further insights into the basic mechanisms of injury and resuscitation.

Koss, W., H. C. Ho, et al. (2009). "Preventing loss of domain: a management strategy for closure of the "open abdomen" during the initial hospitalization." J Surg Educ 66(2): 89-95.

               BACKGROUND: In the management of the abdominal compartment syndrome resulting in an open abdomen, the so-called "planned ventral hernia" is considered an acceptable outcome. We describe a technique of surgical management of the abdominal wound that allows fascial closure in most cases during the initial admission. METHODS: Consecutive trauma patients with abdominal compartment syndrome managed with an open abdomen over a 3-year period were identified. Medical records and the trauma data registry were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, operative treatment, timing and type of wound management, closure of the abdomen, and outcome. RESULTS: From January 2004 to January 2007, 23 patients underwent management with an open abdomen. The mechanism of injury was blunt in 83% of patients and penetrating in 17%. All 18 survivors underwent primary fascial closure of the abdomen using a vacuum- and tie-assisted technique of wound closure. The mean time to closure was 11 +/- 4.4 days (range, 4-18 days). In all, 9 complications occurred in 7 patients, which included 1 reoperation for abscess after fascial closure. There was no dehiscence and no fistula. The Apache II score was 19.3 +/- 6.9 (range, 7-30), and the injury severity score was 32.3 + 10.6 (range, 9-50). CONCLUSIONS: A technique of managing the open abdomen that prevents fascial retraction results in a high primary closure rate with an acceptable rate of short-term complications.

Leppaniemi, A. (2009). "Surgical management of abdominal compartment syndrome; indications and techniques." Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 17(1): 17.

               ABSTRACT: The indications for surgical decompression of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are not clearly defined, but undoubtedly some patients benefit from it. In patients without recent abdominal incisions, it can be achieved with full-thickness laparostomy (either midline, or transverse subcostal) or through a subcutaneous linea alba fasciotomy. In spite of the improvement in physiological variables and significant decrease in IAP, however, the effects of surgical decompression on organ function and outcome are less clear. Because of the significant morbidity associated with surgical decompression and the management of the ensuing open abdomen, more research is needed to better define the appropriate indications and techniques for surgical intervention.

Luo, G., Y. Peng, et al. (2009). "Fluid resuscitation for major burn patients with the TMMU protocol." Burns.

               BACKGROUND: Fluid resuscitation is one of the critical treatments for the major burn patient in the early phases after injury. We evaluated the practice of fluid resuscitation for severely burned patients with the Third Military Medical University (TMMU) protocol, which is most widely used in many regions of China. METHODS: Patients with major burns (>30% total body surface area (TBSA)) presenting to Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, between January 2005 and October 2007, were included in this study. Fluid resuscitation was initiated by the TMMU protocol. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were (46 adults and 25 children) included in this study. All patients survived the first 48h after injury smoothly and none developed abdominal compartment syndrome or other recognised complications associated with fluid resuscitation. The average quantity of fluid infused was 3.3-61.33% more than that calculated based on the TMMU protocol in both adult and paediatric groups. The average urine output during the first 24h after injury was about 1.2ml per kg body weight per hour in the two groups, but reached 1.2ml and 1.7ml during the second 24h in adult and pediatric groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the TMMU protocol for fluid resuscitation is a feasible option for burn patients. Individualised resuscitation - guided by the physiological response to fluid administration - is still important as in other protocols.

Makar, R. R., S. A. Badger, et al. (2009). "The effects of abdominal compartment hypertension after open and endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm." J Vasc Surg 49(4): 866-72.

               OBJECTIVE: This study assessed if emergency endovascular repair (eEVR) reduces the increase in intra-abdominal compartment pressure and host inflammatory response in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Thirty patients with ruptured AAA were prospectively recruited. Patients were offered eEVR or emergency conventional open repair (eOR) depending on anatomic suitability. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured postoperatively, at 2 and 6 hours, and then daily for 5 days. Organ dysfunction was assessed preoperatively by calculating the Hardman score. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and lung injury scores were calculated regularly postoperatively. Hematologic analyses included serum urea and electrolytes, liver function indices, and C-reactive protein. Urine was analyzed for the albumin-creatinine ratio. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (12 men; mean age, 72.2 +/- 6.2 years) underwent eEVR, and 16 (14 men; mean age, 71.4 +/- 7.0 years) had eOR. Intra-abdominal pressure was significantly higher in the eOR cohort compared with the eEVR group. The eEVR patients had significantly less blood loss (P < .001) and transfused (P < .001) and total intraoperative intravenous fluid infusion (P = .001). The eOR group demonstrated a greater risk of organ dysfunction, with a higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome score at day 5 (P = .005) and higher lung injury scores at days 1 and 3 (P = .02 and P = .02) compared with eEVR. A significant correlation was observed between intra-abdominal pressure and the volume of blood lost and transfused, amount of fluid given, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, multiple organ dysfunction score, lung injury score, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that eEVR of ruptured AAA is less stressful and is associated with less intra-abdominal hypertension and host inflammatory response compared with eOR.

Malbrain, M. and I. De laet (2009). "Functional hemodynamics and increased intra-abdominal pressure:same threholds for different conditions?" Crit Care Med 37: 781.

Malbrain, M. L. and I. E. De Iaet (2009). "Intra-abdominal hypertension: evolving concepts." Clin Chest Med 30(1): 45-70, viii.

               This article focuses primarily on the recent literature on abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and the definitions and recommendations published by the World Society for the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The definitions regarding increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) are listed and are followed by an overview of the different mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Measurement techniques for IAP are discussed, as are recommendations for organ function support and options for treatment in patients who have IAH. ACS was first described in surgical patients who had abdominal trauma, bleeding, or infection; but recently, ACS has been described in patients who have other pathologies. This article intends to provide critical care physicians with a clear insight into the current state of knowledge regarding IAH and ACS.

Malbrain, M. L., I. De laet, et al. (2009). "Can the abdominal perimeter be used as an accurate estimation of intra-abdominal pressure?" Crit Care Med 37(1): 316-9.

               INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter and prognostic indicator of the patient's underlying physiologic status. Correct IAP measurement, therefore, is crucial. Most of the direct and indirect techniques are not free from risks and require some time and skills. This study looks at the possibility of using the abdominal perimeter (AP) as a quick estimation for IAP. METHODS: In total, 237 paired measurements were performed in 26 intensive care unit patients. The IAP was measured according to the recommendations of the World Society on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome via an indwelling bladder catheter using a pressure transducer. The AP was defined as the abdominal circumference at its largest point using body marks as reference for consecutive measurements. RESULTS: The male:female ratio was 1:1, age 69.8 +/- 15.2 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 26.5 +/- 9.2, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score 58 +/- 15.5. The number of measurements in each patient was 9.4 +/- 4.6. The IAP was 10.8 +/- 4.9 mm Hg, and the AP was 101 +/- 19.2 cm. There was a poor but statistically significant correlation between IAP and AP: AP = 1.8 x IAP + 81.6 (R2 = 0.21, p = 0.04), but the bias was considerable. The correlation was somewhat better between DeltaIAP (the difference between two consecutive IAP measurements) and DeltaAP (the difference between two consecutive AP measurements) in 210 paired measurements: DeltaAP = 0.4 x DeltaIAP + 0.1 (R2 = 0.24, p < 0.0001). The analysis according to Bland and Altman showed that DeltaIAP was almost identical to DeltaAP with a mean difference or bias of 0 +/- 3 (95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 0.4); however, the limits of agreement were large and thus reflect poor agreement. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the poor correlation between IAP and AP, the latter cannot be used as a clinical estimate for IAP. The correlation between DeltaIAP and DeltaAP was somewhat better, meaning that DeltaAP can be used as an estimate of the evolution of IAP over time; however, for making a definite diagnosis of intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome, the exact value of IAP needs to be measured.

Malbrain, M. L. and I. E. De laet (2009). "Intra-abdominal hypertension: evolving concepts." Clin Chest Med 30(1): 45-70, viii.

               This article focuses primarily on the recent literature on abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and the definitions and recommendations published by the World Society for the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The definitions regarding increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) are listed and are followed by an overview of the different mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Measurement techniques for IAP are discussed, as are recommendations for organ function support and options for treatment in patients who have IAH. ACS was first described in surgical patients who had abdominal trauma, bleeding, or infection; but recently, ACS has been described in patients who have other pathologies. This article intends to provide critical care physicians with a clear insight into the current state of knowledge regarding IAH and ACS.

Malbrain, M. L., I. E. De Laet, et al. (2009). "IAH/ACS: The Rationale for Surveillance." World J Surg 33(6): 1110-5.

               Surveillance for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) should be implemented in every intensive care unit (ICU), because it has been demonstrated that surveillance is effective. Several criteria that have led to the conclusion that IAH/ACS monitoring is of value: First, IAH is a frequent problem in critically ill patients that directly affects function of all organ systems to some degree, and that is associated with considerable mortality. Furthermore, simple tools for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring are available, and it can be safely applied without the need for advanced tools. Finally, both ACS and IAH can be treated with either medical or surgical interventions. Treatment for IAH/ACS should be selected on the basis of the severity of symptoms and the cause of IAH. IAP monitoring should also be incorporated in the daily ICU management of the patient.

Mao, E. Q., Y. Q. Tang, et al. (2009). "Fluid therapy for severe acute pancreatitis in acute response stage." Chin Med J (Engl) 122(2): 169-73.

               BACKGROUND: Fluid therapy for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) should not only resolve deficiency of blood volume, but also prevent fluid sequestration in acute response stage. Up to date, there has not a strategy for fluid therapy dedicated to SAP. So, this study was aimed to investigate the effects of fluid therapy treatment on prognosis of SAP. METHODS: Seventy-six patients were admitted prospectively according to the criteria within 72 hours of SAP onset. They were randomly assigned to a rapid fluid expansion group (Group I, n = 36) and a controlled fluid expansion group (Group II, n = 40). Hemodynamic disorders were either quickly (fluid infusion rate was 10 - 15 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1), Group I) or gradually improved (fluid infusion rate was 5 - 10 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1), Group II) through controlling the rate of fluid infusion. Parameters of fluid expansion, blood lactate concentration were obtained when meeting the criteria for fluid expansion. And APACHE II scores were obtained serially for 72 hours. Rate of mechanical ventilation, incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), sepsis, and survival rate were obtained. RESULTS: The two groups had statistically different (P < 0.05) time intervals to meet fluid expansion criteria (Group I, 13.5 +/- 6.6 hours; Group II, (24.0 +/- 5.4) hours). Blood lactate concentrations were both remarkably lower as compared to the level upon admission (P < 0.05) and reached the normal level in both groups upon treatment. It was only at day 1 that hematocrit was significantly lower in Group I (35.6% +/- 6.8%) than in Group II (38.5% +/- 5.4%) (P < 0.01). Amount of crystalloid and colloid in group I ((4028 +/- 1980) ml and (1336 +/- 816) ml) on admission day was more than those of group II ((2472 +/- 1871) ml and (970 +/- 633) ml). No significant difference was found in the total amount of fluids within four days of admission between the two groups (P > 0.05). Total amount of fluid sequestration within 4 days was higher in Group I ((5378 +/- 2751) ml) than in Group II ((4215 +/- 1998) ml, P < 0.05). APACHE II scores were higher in Group I on days 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.05). Rate of mechanical ventilation was higher in group I (94.4%) than in group II (65%, P < 0.05). The incidences of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and sepsis were significantly lower in Group II (P < 0.05). Survival rate was remarkably lower in Group I (69.4%) than in Group II (90%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Controlled fluid resuscitation offers better prognosis in patients with severe volume deficit within 72 hours of SAP onset.

Markell, K. W., E. M. Renz, et al. (2009). "Abdominal complications after severe burns." J Am Coll Surg 208(5): 940-7; discussion 947-9.

               BACKGROUND: Abdominal catastrophe in the severely burned patient without abdominal injury has been described. We perceived an alarming recent incidence of this complication in our burn center, both during acute resuscitation and later in the hospital course. We sought to define incidence, outcomes, and associated factors, such as excessive resuscitation volume and treatment issues. STUDY DESIGN: We examined all severely burned military and civilian patients with abdominal pathology between March 2003 and February 2008. Data included age, gender, total body surface area burn, inhalation injury, Injury Severity Score, disposition, resuscitation volume, time from injury to diagnosis, use of recombinant factor VIIa, vasopressors, and early tube feedings. We assembled a Delphi panel of surgeons experienced in abdominal catastrophes to review these data. RESULTS: Among 1,825 patients admitted to the US Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center, 120 (6.6%) were diagnosed with abdominal pathology (burn size 48% +/- 19%), of which 51 (2.8%) had abdominal catastrophe. The majority of these occurred in the first days after injury with associated abdominal compartment syndrome (32 of 51) and increased linearly to burn size. We noted another group of patients who presented primarily with ischemic bowel later in the course, with the same clinical presentation. Resuscitation volume was 6.02 mL/kg/percent total body surface area burned. Vasopressors were used in 71% of patients and tube feedings in 57% before diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal catastrophe without abdominal trauma occurs in 2.8% of our population. Associated mortality was 78% without obvious cause. Delphi panel experts recommended more aggressive monitoring of abdominal compartment pressures and earlier operative management to improve outcomes.

Mayer, D., T. Pfammatter, et al. (2009). "10 years of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms: lessons learned." Ann Surg 249(3): 510-5.

               OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a single center's 10-year experience with emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) in 102 patients with ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms (RAAA). METHODS: Data from 102 patients (mean age, 73 +/- 9 years) with RAAA treated by eEVAR from January 1998 to April 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. From January 2000, all patients were treated according to an intention-to-treat protocol. The only exclusion criterion was unsuitable anatomy. 31/102 patients had moderate shock and 14/102 patients had severe shock with a systolic blood pressure <70 mm Hg or <50 mm Hg, respectively. 71/102 procedures were carried out under local anesthesia. Endograft types used were mainly bifurcated (92/102). Open abdomen treatment (OAT) because of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) was used when signs of organ failure occurred and/or bladder pressure rose >20 mm Hg. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality for eEVAR was 13% (13/102). Technical success (defined as successful deployment of the endograft, absence of extravasation in the postprocedural contrast enhanced CT scan and hemodynamic stabilization) was 99% (101/102). Nineteen unstable patients (19%) required transfemoral supraceliac aortic balloon occlusion. ACS was detected and treated by OAT in 20 patients (20%). 16 type I, 26 type II and 1 type III endoleaks were detected on postoperative CT examination. Two patients had a combined type I and II endoleak. 11 patients were retreated for immediate correction of 10 type I and 2 type II endoleaks. 6 type I and 1 type III low-flow endoleaks were observed and resolved spontaneously within 30 days. Major 30-day morbidity was 35%. CONCLUSION: In this 102 patient contemporary series of eEVAR for RAAA, endografting proved to be safe with a 30-day mortality of 13%. Key components of this favorable outcome result were adequate preoperative diagnostic imaging, hypotensive hemostasis, selective transfemoral supraceliac aortic balloon occlusion, predominantly local anesthesia, detection and treatment of ACS, and attention to logistics. Widespread adoption of these treatment components is recommended.

Mogilner, J., I. Sukhotnik, et al. (2009). "Effect of Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure on Portal Vein and Superior Mesenteric Artery Blood Flow in a Rat." J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A.

               Abstract Aim: Recent clinical experience suggests that minimal access portoenterostomy (the Kasai procedure) for biliary atresia leads to transplantation sooner, compared to the traditional open approach. It should be emphasized that elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) may reduce hepatic and portal blood flow and thus may cause histologic liver damage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of IAP on blood flow in the portal vein (PV), compared to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and on the systemic mean arterial blood pressure (MABP). Materials and Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (90 mg per kg) and xylasine (13 mg per kg). Polyethylene catheters (PE-50) were introduced into the right carotid artery for the measurement of MABP. After a midline laparotomy, the SMA and PV were isolated. Ultrasonic blood-flow probes were placed on the vessels for the continuous measurement of regional blood flow. Two large-caliber percutaneous peripheral intravenous catheters were introduced into the peritoneal cavity for inflation of air and for the measurement of IAP. The time course of MABP and SMA and PV flow as well as the relationship between IAP and SMA and PV flow were determined. Results: Although all three hemodynamic parameters decreased with the increase in the IAP, the most significant changes were observed in PV blood flow. IAP at 3 mm Hg resulted in a 26% decrease in PV flow (P < 0.05), a 19% decrease in SMA flow (P < 0.05), and an 11% decrease in MABP (P < 0.05). IAP at 6 mm Hg caused a two-fold decrease in PV flow (P < 0.05), a 30% decrease in SMA flow (P < 0.05), and a 19% decrease in MABP (P < 0.05). There were no changes in the time course of MABP and PV and SMA flow. PV and SMA flow returned to normal values immediately after abdominal deflation. Conclusions: Persistent IAP decreased MABP, SMA, and, especially, PV flow by 50%. We speculate that in biliary atresia patients with already present liver dysfunction, decrease in SMA flow and even a greater decrease in PV flow from increased IAP, which occurs during a laparoscopic Kasai procedure, may further compromise liver function. This may be one of the explanations for the progression to earlier transplantation in infants undergoing a laparoscopic Kasai procedure.

Moore, A. B. and D. K. Nakayama (2009). "Preformed silastic silos in the management of necrotizing enterocolitis." Am Surg 75(2): 172-4.

               Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is sometimes complicated by abdominal compartment syndrome, a clinical syndrome characterized by multiple organ dysfunction that arises as a consequence of increased intra-abdominal pressure. The evolving clinical picture of NEC sometimes requires "second-look" operations done after initial abdominal exploration to more accurately gauge the optimal extent of surgery. Placing intestines in a preformed, spring-loaded, transparent Silastic silo, traditionally used in the staged treatment of gastroschisis, addresses both situations: decompression of the abdomen and allowing periodic inspection of the intestines. Standard silos were used in three infants with advanced (Bell Class 3) NEC without perforation before definitive surgery. Clinical indices and laboratory values were recorded during the patients' hospital courses. All three infants had extensive areas of intestinal ischemia and necrosis. FiO2, acidosis, and urinary output remained stable or improved in two patients. Silo placement corrected abdominal compartment syndrome in the third patient. Intestinal resection was required in all infants, each achieving surgical resolution of NEC. Two patients ultimately died from respiratory and neurologic complications. Application of a silo addresses abdominal compartment syndrome as a complication of NEC and allows continual inspection of the intestines. Physiological indices may improve the patient's overall clinical status.

Olofsson, P. H., S. Berg, et al. (2009). "Gastrointestinal microcirculation and cardiopulmonary function during experimentally increased intra-abdominal pressure." Crit Care Med 37(1): 230-9.

               OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess gastric, intestinal, and renal cortex microcirculation parallel with central hemodynamics and respiratory function during stepwise increase of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). DESIGN: Prospective, controlled animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory, University Hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-six anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Following baseline registrations, CO2 peritoneum was inflated (n = 20) and IAP increased stepwise by 10 mm Hg at 10 mins intervals up to 50 mm Hg and subsequently exsufflated. Control animals (n = 6) were not insufflated with CO2. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The microcirculation of gastric mucosa, small bowel mucosa, small bowel seromuscular layer, colon mucosa, colon seromuscular layer, and renal cortex were selectively studied at all pressure levels and after exsufflation using a four-channel laser Doppler flowmeter (Periflex 5000, Perimed). Central hemodynamic and respiratory function data were registered at each level and after exsufflation. Cardiac output decreased significantly at IAP levels above 10 mm Hg. The microcirculation of gastric mucosa, renal cortex and the seromuscular layer of small bowel and colon was significantly reduced with each increase of IAP. The microcirculation of the small bowel mucosa and colon mucosa was significantly less affected compared with the serosa (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our animal model of low and high IAP by intraperitoneal CO2-insufflation worked well for studies of microcirculation, hemodynamics, and pulmonary function. During stepwise increases of pressure there were marked effects on global hemodynamics, respiratory function, and microcirculation. The results indicate that intestinal mucosal flow, especially small bowel mucosal flow, although reduced, seems better preserved in response to intra-abdominal hypertension caused by CO2-insufflation than other intra-abdominal microvascular beds.

Paal, P., A. Neurauter, et al. (2009). "Effects of stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during spontaneous circulation in pigs." Resuscitation 80(4): 470-7.

               AIM: Stomach inflation during mask ventilation is frequent, but the effects on haemodynamic and pulmonary function are unclear. We evaluated the effects of stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during spontaneous circulation in a porcine model. METHODS: Randomised prospective animal study. After randomisation, in 23 domestic pigs the stomach was inflated every 90s with 0L (control; n=8), 0.5L (n=7) or 1L (n=8) ambient air. RESULTS: After 22.5min, i.e. 8.5L in the 0.5L and 17L in the 1L stomach inflation group, stomach inflation increased central venous pressure (median) (control: 10mmHg vs. 1L: 23mmHg, P<0.05) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (control: 24mmHg vs. 1L: 45mmHg, P<0.05). As a result stroke volume index decreased (control: 135mL/kg vs. 0.5L: 90mL/kg, P<0.05; vs. 1L: 72mL/kg, P<0.05). Stomach inflation also decreased static pulmonary compliance (control: 24mL/cmH(2)O vs. 0.5L: 8mL/cmH(2)O, P<0.05; vs. 1L: 3mL/cmH(2)O, P<0.05), which increased peak airway pressure (control: 28cmH(2)O vs. 0.5L: 69cmH(2)O, P<0.05; vs. 1L: 73cmH(2)O, P<0.05). Additionally, arterial oxygen partial pressure (control: 305mmHg vs. 0.5L: 140mmHg, P<0.05; vs. 1L: 21mmHg, P<0.05) and systemic oxygen delivery (control: 53mLO(2)/min vs. 1L: 19mLO(2)/min, P<0.05) decreased. Stomach inflation increased mortality (control: 0/8 vs. 1L: 5/8, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Stomach inflation with 1L when compared to 0.5L increments resulted in faster haemodynamic and pulmonary failure and increased mortality. Stomach inflation may cause a hyper-acute abdominal compartment syndrome.

Paal, P., A. Neurauter, et al. (2009). "Effects of stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs." Resuscitation 80(3): 365-71.

               AIM: Stomach inflation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is frequent, but the effect on haemodynamic and pulmonary function is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of clinically realistic stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during CPR in a porcine model. METHODS: After baseline measurements ventricular fibrillation was induced in 21 pigs, and the stomach was inflated with 0L (n=7), 5L (n=7) or 10L air (n=7) before initiating CPR. RESULTS: During CPR, 0, 5, and 10L stomach inflation resulted in higher mean pulmonary artery pressure [median (min-max)] [35 (28-40), 47 (25-50), and 51 (49-75) mmHg; P<0.05], but comparable coronary perfusion pressure [10 (2-20), 8 (4-35) and 5 (2-13) mmHg; P=0.54]. Increasing (0, 5, and 10L) stomach inflation decreased static pulmonary compliance [52 (38-98), 19 (8-32), and 12 (7-15) mL/cmH(2)O; P<0.05], and increased peak airway pressure [33 (27-36), 53 (45-104), and 103 (96-110) cmH(2)O; P<0.05). Arterial oxygen partial pressure was higher with 0L when compared with 5 and 10L stomach inflation [378 (88-440), 58 (47-113), and 54 (43-126) mmHg; P<0.05). Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure was lower with 0L when compared with 5 and 10L stomach inflation [30 (24-36), 41(34-51), and 56 (45-68) mmHg; P<0.05]. Return of spontaneous circulation was comparable between groups (5/7 in 0L, 4/7 in 5L, and 3/7 in 10L stomach inflation; P=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing levels of stomach inflation had adverse effects on haemodynamic and pulmonary function, indicating an acute abdominal compartment syndrome in this CPR model.

Papavramidis, T. S., V. Duros, et al. (2009). "Intra-abdominal pressure alterations after large pancreatic pseudocyst transcutaneous drainage." BMC Gastroenterol 9(1): 42.

               ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis leads to abdominal hypertension and compartment syndrome. Weeks after the episodes pancreatic fluids sometimes organize to pseudocysts, fluid collections by or in the gland. Aims of the present study were to evaluate the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) induced by large pancreatic pseudocysts and to examine the effect of their transcutaneous drainage on IAP. METHODS: Twenty seven patients with a pancreatic pseudocyst were included. Nine patients with pseudocysts greater than 1l (group A) had CT drainage and eighteen (volume less than 1l) were the control group. The measurements of group A were taken 6 hours before and every morning after the drainage, while for group B, two measurements were performed, one at the day of the initial CT and one 7 days after. Abdominal compliance (Cabd) was calculated. Data were analyzed using student's t-test. RESULTS: Baseline IAP for group A was 9.3 mmHg (S.D. 1.7 mmHg), while the first post-drainage day (PDD) IAP was 5.1 mmHg (S.D. 0.7 mmHg). The second PDD IAP was 5.6 mmHg (S.D. 0.8 mmHg), the third 6.4 mmH (S.D. 1.2 mmHg)g, the fourth 6.9 mmHg (S.D. 1.6 mmHg), the fifth 7.9 mmHg (S.D. 1.5 mmHg), the sixth 8.2 mmHg (S.D. 1.4 mmHg), and the seventh 8.2 mmHg (S.D. 1.5 mmHg). Group B had baseline IAP 8.0 mmHg (S.D. 1.2 mmHg) and final 8.2 mmHg (S.D. 1.4 mmHg). Cabd after drainage was 185.6 ml/mmHg (SD 47.5 ml/mmHg). IAP values were reduced between the baseline and all the post-drainage measurements in group A. IAPs seem to stabilize after the 5th post-drainage day. Baseline IAP was higher in group A than in group B, while the two values, at day 7, were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The drainage of large pancreatic pseudocyst reduces IAP. Moreover, the IAP seems to rise shortly after the drainage again, but in a way that it remains inferior to the initial value. More chronic changes to the IAP are related to abdominal cavity's properties and have to be further studied.

Peris, A., S. Matano, et al. (2009). "Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy to diagnose intraabdominal pathology in the intensive care unit." Crit Care 13(1): R25.

               ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Delayed diagnosis of intraabdominal pathology in the intensive care unit (ICU) increases rates of morbidity and mortality. Intraabdominal pathologies are usually identified through presenting symptoms, clinical signs, and laboratory and radiological results; however, these could also delay diagnosis because of inconclusive laboratory tests or imaging results, or the inability to safely transfer a patient to the radiology room. In the current study we evaluated the safety and accuracy of bedside diagnostic laparoscopy to confirm the presence of intraabdominal pathology in an ICU setting. METHODS: This retrospective study, carried out between January 2006 and June 2008, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of bedside diagnostic laparoscopy performed on patients with a suspicion of ongoing intraabdominal pathology. Clinical indications for bedside diagnostic laparoscopy were: ultrasonography (US) images of gallbladder distension or wall thickening of more than 3 to 4 mm, with or without pericholecystic fluid; elevation of laboratory tests (bilirubin, transaminases, myoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine phosphokinase, gamma-glutamyltransferase); high level of lactate/metabolic acidosis; CT images inconclusive for intraabdominal pathology; or inability to perform a CT scan. Patients did not undergo bedside diagnostic laparoscopy if they presented clear indications for open surgery, coagulopathy, abdominal wall infection or high intraabdominal pressure. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent bedside diagnostic laparoscopy (Visiport Plus, Autosuture, US), 14 of whom had been admitted to the ICU for major trauma, 12 for sepsis of unknown origin and 6 for complications after cardiac surgery. The procedure was performed on an average of eight days after ICU admission (95% confidence interval = 5 to 15 days) and mean procedure duration was 40 minutes. None of the procedures resulted in complications. Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy was diagnostic for intraabdominal pathology in 15 patients, who subsequently underwent surgery, except in two cases of diffuse gut hypoperfusion. Diagnosis of cholecystitis was obtained in seven cases: two were treated with laparotomic cholecystectomy and five with percutaneous gallbladder drainage positioning. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy represents a safe and accurate technique for diagnosing intraabdominal pathology in an ICU setting and should be taken into consideration when patient transfer to radiology or the operating room is considered unsafe, or when routine radiological examinations are not conclusive enough to reach a definite diagnosis.

Renner, J., M. Gruenewald, et al. (2009). "Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model*." Crit Care Med.

               Objective: Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) have been shown to reliably predict the response to fluid administration in different patient populations. The influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on the predictive ability of these variables is currently under debate. Therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate whether PPV and SVV are suitable for predicting fluid responsiveness during elevated IAP. Design: Prospective controlled experimental study.

Setting: Animal research laboratory. Subjects: 14 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. Interventions: Pigs were studied at different experimental stages: normovolemia at baseline conditions, after induction of pneumoperitoneum (PP) by increasing IAP up to 25 mm Hg, followed by releasing PP and performing a fluid load with 1000 cc hydroxyl-ethyl starch 6%, and finally after inducing PP again. Cardiac output, stroke volume, central venous pressure, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were obtained by pulmonary artery thermodilution. Additionally, global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) was measured by transpulmonary thermodilution. PPV and SVV were monitored continuously by pulse contour analysis. Measurements and Main Results: PP induced significant changes in peak airway pressure, esophageal pressure, chest wall compliance, SVV, PPV, central venous pressure, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure independent of loading conditions. As assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, PPV, SVV, and GEDV accurately predicted fluid responsiveness before IAP was increased (area under the curve: 0.90, 0.91 and 0.91). A PPV value of >11.5%, a SVV value of >9.5%, and a GEDV value of <963 mL accurately predicted an increase in stroke volume >15%. After increasing IAP, the ability of SVV to predict fluid responsiveness was abolished, whereas it was preserved with both PPV and GEDV, although the threshold value for PPV dramatically increased up to >20.5%. Conclusions: In this animal model PPV and GEDV proved to be sensitive and specific predictors of fluid responsiveness even during increased IAP.

Reske, A. P., D. Schreiter, et al. (2009). "[Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome--basic knowledge and anesthesiological aspects]." Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 44(5): 336-42; quiz 343.

               The increase in intra-abdominal pressure may be followed by a renal, gut, respiratory and cardial dysfunction and an increase in intra-cranial pressure. The review focuses risk factors and pathophysiological consequences of intra-abdominal hypertension and of abdominal compartment syndrome. Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are critical ill and need special anesthesiological care due to risk of pulmonary aspiration, hemodynamic disturbances and difficult mechanical ventilation.

Richter, C. E., S. Saber, et al. (2009). "Eclampsia Complicated by Abdominal Compartment Syndrome." Am J Perinatol.

               A primigravida with eclampsia and hemolytic anemia, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP syndrome) developed intra-abdominal compartment syndrome requiring a decompressive laparotomy, underlining the importance of including abdominal compartment syndrome in the differential diagnosis in pregnant women. 

Scheppach, W. (2009). "Abdominal compartment syndrome." Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 23(1): 25-33.

               Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has received growing attention in critically ill patients. Pathophysiologically, it deranges cardiovascular haemodynamics, respiratory and renal functions and may eventually lead to multi-organ failure. It is primarily seen in surgical intensive care units and is frequently associated with abdominal trauma but also occurs after elective abdominal surgery. Non-surgical intensivists ought to be aware that the syndrome is also seen in a wide spectrum of medical conditions, e.g. acute pancreatitis. An expert panel has recently set up definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH, sustained or repeated pathological elevation in IAP > or = 12 mmHg) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS, sustained IAP > 20 mmHg associated with a new organ dysfunction or failure). As clinical signs of IAH are unreliable, IAP should be measured non-invasively by the 'bladder technique'. It is hoped that the consensus definitions will contribute to a broader recognition and effective treatment of this life-threatening syndrome.

Sharma, A., H. Sachdev, et al. (2009). "Abdominal compartment syndrome during hip arthroscopy." Anaesthesia 64(5): 567-9.

               Hip arthroscopy is recognised as a highly effective means of treating joint disorders. The majority of complications associated with hip arthroscopy involve neurovascular traction injury. We report a relatively unusual complication of hip arthroscopy, extravasation of irrigation fluid into the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal cavities, resulting in abdominal compartment syndrome.

Sugrue, M. and Y. Buhkari (2009). "Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal compartment syndrome in acute general surgery." World J Surg 33(6): 1123-7.

               BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a harbinger of intra-abdominal mischief, and its measurement is cheap, simple to perform, and reproducible. Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), especially grades 3 and 4 (IAP > 18 mmHg), occurs in over a third of patients and is associated with an increase in intra-abdominal sepsis, bleeding, renal failure, and death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Increased IAP reading may provide an objective bedside stimulus for surgeons to expedite diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of critically ill patients. One of the greatest challenges surgeons and intensivists face worldwide is lack of recognition of the known association between IAH, ACS, and intra-abdominal sepsis. This lack of awareness of IAH and its progression to ACS may delay timely intervention and contribute to excessive patient resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: All patients entering the intensive care unit (ICU) after emergency general surgery or massive fluid resuscitation should have an IAP measurement performed every 6 h. Each ICU should have guidelines relating to techniques of IAP measurement and an algorithm for management of IAH.

Sugrue, P. A., B. A. O'Shaughnessy, et al. (2009). "Abdominal complications following kyphosis correction in ankylosing spondylitis." J Neurosurg Spine 10(2): 154-9.

               Spinal deformity surgery is associated with high rates of morbidity and a wide range of complications. The most significant abdominal complications following kyphosis correction, while uncommon, can certainly pose significant infectious and hemodynamic risks to the patient. Abdominal compartment syndrome is the most severe of the sequelae. It is the end result of elevated abdominal compartment pressure with physiological compromise and end organ system dysfunction. Although most commonly associated with trauma, abdominal compartment syndrome has also been witnessed following massive fluid shifts, which can occur during adult spinal deformity surgery. In this manuscript, we report on 2 patients with ankylosing spondylitis who developed significant abdominal pathology requiring exploratory laparotomy following kyphosis correction. In addition to describing the details of each case, we propose explanations of the relevant pathophysiology and review diagnostic and treatment strategies for such events. The key to effectively treating such a debilitating complication is to recognize it quickly and intervene rapidly and aggressively.

Trevelyan, S. L. and G. L. Carlson (2009). "Is TNP in the open abdomen safe and effective?" J Wound Care 18(1): 24-5.

               Much of the evidence for the use of TNP in the open abdomen comes from data on trauma patients. In view of the potentially severe complications, much greater evidence is needed for its application on patients with abdominal sepsis.

Umgelter, A., W. Reindl, et al. (2009). "Renal resistive index and renal function before and after paracentesis in patients with hepatorenal syndrome and tense ascites." Intensive Care Med 35(1): 152-6.

               OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of reducing intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) by paracentesis on renal resistive index (RI), hemodynamics and renal function. DESIGN AND SETTING: Uncontrolled trial in a university gastroenterological intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Twelve spontaneously breathing cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome, tense ascites and a clinical indication for paracentesis. INTERVENTIONS: Paracentesis and substitution of albumin. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables were assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution, RI was determined by Doppler ultrasound of renal interlobar arteries. After paracentesis and albumin substitution, there was a significant decrease of IAP (20 mmHg (19-22) to 12 mmHg (10-13), systemic vascular resistance index (from 1,243 dyn s/cm(5)/m(2) (1,095-1,745) to 939 dyn s/cm(5)/m(2) (812-1,365); p = 0.005) and RI (from 0.848 (0.810-0.884) to 0.810 (0.780-0.826); p = 0.003). Arterial compliance increased from 1.33 mL/mmHg (0.89-1.74) to 1.71 mL/mmHg (1.21-2.12), pulse pressure index remained unchanged. Creatinine clearance (ClCreat) increased significantly from 5 mL/min (0-28) to 9 mL/min (0-36) (p = 0.018) and urinary output from 12 mL/h (0-49) to 16 mL/h (0-64) (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis, HRS and tense ascites, IAP may contribute to renal dysfunction. Reduction of IAP following paracentesis and albumin substitution may improve ClCreat, probably by improving renal blood flow as reflected by decreasing RI in Doppler ultrasound.

van der Steeg, H., J. P. van Akkeren, et al. (2009). "Validation of the urine column measurement as an estimation of the intra-abdominal pressure." Intensive Care Med.

               OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the urine column (UC) measurement compared to the intra-vesicular pressure (IVP) measurement as an estimation of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in patients with IAP up to 30 mmHg. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. All patients were catheterized. IVP measurements were performed using a pressure transducer connected to the culture aspiration port. UC measurements were done by holding up the tubing against a measuring rod. The symphysis pubis was used as the zero-reference. IAP was raised from 0 to 30 mmHg using increments of 5 mmHg, during which first the IVP and then UC measurement series were recorded end-expiratory. Fifty and 100 ml of saline were used as a priming volume. RESULTS: The IVP and UC measurements showed a significant correlation with IAP. Comparing IVP and UC showed a correlation of 0.91 (p < 0.001) for 50 ml and 0.87 (p < 0.001) for 100 ml of saline as a priming volume. Using 50 ml of saline, UC was 0.68 mmHg higher than IVP (95% CI -7.21 to +5.85 mmHg). For 100 ml of saline, UC was 1.23 mmHg lower than IVP (95% CI -7.41 to +9.87 mmHg). CONCLUSION: UC measurement shows significant correlation to IVP measurement as an estimation of the IAP. Further study needs to be done to conclude whether UC measurement is a reliable clinical alternative to IVP measurement.

Vikrama, K. S., N. K. Shyamkumar, et al. (2009). "Percutaneous catheter drainage in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome." Can J Surg 52(1): E19-20.